- Bulletin to Harrisburg: Philadelphia is Part of Pennsylvania
- Today's Email from Siobhan Reardon
- Seth Williams Office Opening Party: TODAY
- Hear, hear: Judge Fox's Order
- Bob Brady saves New Year's and the Mummers!
- Mayoral Petulance: Unbelievable
- ’San Quentin Six’ prisoner Hugo Pinell to have Parole Hearing Jan. 17
- The Nutter administration (and us) at the crossroads
- Ring around the rosey, pockets full of.....
- Ring around the rosey, pockets full of.....
Academic Bill of Rights
It looks like the Conservative proponents of the Academic Bill of Rights had a victory in Pennsylvania. This from Inside Higher Ed:
But on Tuesday, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed a resolution creating a special committee that is charged with investigating — at public colleges in the state — how faculty members are hired and promoted, whether students are fairly evaluated, and whether students have the right to express their views without fear of being punished for them.
The language in the resolution closely follows that of the Academic Bill of Rights, which has been pushed nationwide by David Horowitz, a former 60s radical who is now a conservative activist.
Let’s be honest, not all professors are fair, and some use their position as a pedestal on which to indoctrinate the youth of America. Whether they are wrong or right, we have to make sure that students have the opportunity to freely express their ideas. If only it were about fairness. We all know that this is just another attempt by people like Horowitz to push a Conservative agenda in our higher educational institutions. Fairness is one thing, but they want to be able to not teach the theory of evolution and allow people to teach revisionist history when it comes to the Holocaust. That cannot stand. I also think that the teachers need to come up with some alternative plan. If we say that we are for fairness, then we have to mean it. We can’t just be against things, because then we look like obstructionists.
Michael Berube had some interesting comments on his blog about this. He quotes frequent Young Philly Politics reader Representative Cohen, who lead the fight against the bill:
This pseudo-investigation has the potential to cause intimidation of many professors and to make the investigators a national laughingstock.
Not a single text of a Pennsylvania complaint was released, but the Horowitz web site, Students for Academic Freedom, quotes one student as saying he or she was victimized for conservative beliefs because his or her paper was both spellchecked and proofread and therefore had to be deserving of a high grade.
Concerned Pennsylvania legislators could use back-up support from state and national members of the academic community. We need to know about reality-based practices and principles to be able to win the media war against Horowitz developed theories and fantasies.
Props go out to Ray for pointing me towards this entry and Representative Cohen for leading the fight against this horrible Bill.











Mark Cohen, Daylin Leach
Both Cohen and Leach gave very good speeches about the bill on the floor of the house. Leach's perspective, as a some time college professor, was an interesting one.
The bottom line is that this is bullshit. A job of a professor is not to make someone feel comfortable. And, so while we dont want our profesors to be purely political animals, the whole idea that these professors are practicing indoctrination, whatever that means here, or are !gasp! giving out B's to some students is so silly.
How exactly would a student prove that they got a bad grade for their beliefs anyway? If I were a professor, and a student complained that they should have gotten an A because they spell checked their paper, I would flunk them on the spot.
yes and no
Pennsylvania is run by a bunch of hick crackpots. You know the saying that we are Philadelphia and Pittsburg with Alabama in between. Well, the state is dominated by the Alabama part. Do you really think that Creationism is not going to peak in there somewhere? Do you think that revisionist historians will not get a platform? I hope not, but I will not bet my money on it.
I'm curious as to what
you basis is for stating that "there IS a problem with bias on campus." Simply stating that more college professors are Democrats than Republicans won't cut the mustard. It doesn't prove bias, or the other kinds of prejudice claimed by the proponents of this kind of bill. Have you followed this story and seen what they put forth as "evidence" of bias? I suggest you follow ACM's link as a place to begin looking for more information. This reminds me of conservatives complaining about the "liberal bias" of the "liberal media." Great material for fomenting anger, but doesn't hold up under scrutiny. Even if you accept the stated motivation for this bill as a reasonable goal, it's still necessary to do some research to see just who is and who isn't being disingenuous.