Alright Nutter!

Yesterday, Mayor Nutter signed into law some pretty serious measures to try to end gun violence. According to the Inky:

The five laws - called everything from unconstitutional to criminal by critics - do the following:

Limit handgun purchases to one a month.

Require lost or stolen firearms to be reported to police within 24 hours.

Prohibit individuals under protection-from-abuse orders from possessing guns if ordered by the court.

Allow removal of firearms from "persons posing a risk of imminent personal injury" to themselves or others.

Outlaw the possession and sale of certain assault weapons.

Cool! It's time the city stood up for itself, and Nutter's actions not only send a signal that his administration is going to devote resources to the fight, but also serve as a real incentive for our local state legislative delegation (including those suburban members who have a vested interest in seeing less guns on the streets) to fight for us too.

After we win, I hope this kind of resolve and logic...

Nutter embraced the idea of taking "direct action" to challenge a legal status quo to protect city residents.

"If we all sat around bemoaning what the law was on a regular basis," Nutter said. "I'd probably still be picking cotton somewhere as opposed to being mayor of the city of Philadelphia."

...will be extended to other areas of divergence between city residents and the state legislature, like allowing same-sex unions, or implementing progressive taxation, or requiring a fair distribution of education funds, or passing an even better campaign finance law, etc.

How awesome would it be if Mayor Nutter made the city solicitors' office into a totally activist office, responsible for challenging the state constitution every time it prohibits Philadelphia from passing progressive laws to the benefit of its people?

the only problem with this

the only problem with this is it will more than likely blow up in his face. The City gets its power legally from the State no matter what some people in the City Solicitors office believe (and it's not many there) the City Charter does not trump the State Constitution. The best way to get these changes thru is by lobbying the legislature and getting behind candidates for the State leg. who would push these laws thru on that level. This, just like Nutter's attempt at stopping the Casino's from coming in will do nothing but move us backwards in this fight as it will push the more conservative members of the legislature as well as organizations such as the NRA on the defensive and from there quickly to the Offensive. The NRA is already noted in the article to be preparing to sue the City over this, a lawsuit which we will have a hard time winning especially when an action like this pushes those who might have been on the fringe or moving towards the anti-gun position far away. If it works i will be the first to praise St. Michael but in reality I don't see this doing anything more than pushing Harrisburg right on top of us in a very bad way

don't disagree

It's gonna be hard to defend and keep these laws in place.

If this is just a one-off PR move with no next step planned, yea you are right, it could piss off and mobilize the NRA and actually make the fight on guns harder.

But if it is an indicator that Nutter is willing to do battle with Harrisburg for the next 8 years tho, that is very cool.

I am hoping for the latter.

It must be the latter

I am amazed by this, and I can't help but think that a calculator like Nutter has to know that it's a doomed proposition on his face: and I find that very encouraging. When the largest city in the state flouts state rulemaking, it's gotta be for a reason. I mean, hell, I never thought the guy could win the mayor's race, either, so he's gotta have some serious tactical chops.

Nutter comes off as such a nice guy, rule-follower, that it's pretty awesome that he's showing a willingness to throw down.

I come from the school that you never get anything serious done without getting in people's faces and pushing them in every way you can think of. Yes, what he's doing probably doesn't have much legal standing, but that's why I think it's kind of awesome. It would be one thing if "New Philadelphia" (little town in Schuykill County) did something like this, but when real Philadelphia does it, that means they are going to have to push back. It will get attention. It will stir debate. The issue will move one way or another, and that's good, because it seems to have been at stalemate.

---
For Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Nomination for President.
This Too Will Pass, for the guts in your cerebrum.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content