- 'An End to the Southern Strategy, But No Post-Racial America' says David Love
- "A Question of Place": An essay on the power of community
- Just Equally Speaking….
- Eagles owe Philadelphia the 8 million it needs to keep libraries open
- who would like to see Verizon offer cable TV in Phila?
- Council Committee Passed the Freeze
- Carol Campbell Passes Away
- My first trip to the public library
- Fight digital exclusion
- What if half of Philadelphia didn't have roads?
Beginning In Politics Is Like Beginning A Novel in the 40th Chapter
Beginning to participate in politics is like starting to read a novel in the 40th Chapter.
So much has gone on before you started. Characters have lived, died, prospered, failed before you. People have fallen in love and out of love many times. Unless you read the early chapters, there will be a lot of things you will not understand about why people act the way they do.
It is a commonplace understanding among political scientists that voting behavior has a large hereditary component, and a large component based on life experiences. How campaigns are run is far from the most important factor for the vast majority of voters.
Candidates who connect with voters are able to figure out the relevancy of current issues with many of the influences on the voters. They are able to address the concerns of political leaders, opinion leaders, civic leaders as well as the concerns of ordinary voters. They are also very lucky people for at least that particular campaign.
It is an extremely difficult process. The vast majority of candidates who seek office do not win. Many who do not win, and some who do win, become deeply frustrated. Politics is inherently competitive: a competition for votes and resources, and a competition for ideas and images.
One of Pennsylvania's most enduring political figures was a Republican named Francis Worley. He started running for office in the 1930's or 1940's, served a good number of terms in the Pennsylvania legislature representing York County, earned a graduate degree studying foreign policy at the University of Pennsylvania while in the legislature, and last ran for office by announcing his candidacy for governor against Tom Ridge in the Republican primary in 1998 while accompanied by a nursing attendant from the assisted living facility he was living in at the time. He did not make it to the ballot that year.
I met Worley in a long line for filing his nominating petition for one of his unsuccessful Congressional races, probably in the 1980's. We had a long wait, so we had a long conversation.
Worley told me he loved running for office, because every campaign enabled him to learn something new. That is a good attitude to have, because it places campaigns in the context of one's life and allows one to claim victory even if one or more opponents gets more votes.











Is this a consolation essay?
Rep. Cohen,
How about writing about something interesting like what kind of legislation you are working on at the moment?
How many more years do you intend to be a state representative? Do you support term limits?
I Do Not Support Term Limits
I do not support term limits. I believe it is strongly against the public interest to dumb done legislative bodies by limiting the tenure of public officials. This legislative session has the potential to be my most productive one yet, because of the combination of 33 years of legislative experience and Democratic majority status and a Democratic governor.
How long I serve as a state legislator is up to the voters. I have no intention of quitting at any time in the forseeable future.
In this legislative session, I support Governor Rendell's strong environmental initiatives, which now require no new taxes to achieve because of revenue growth.
I support greater mass transit funding, which will require some new taxes, but is worth the investment. I do not support a sale or long-term lease of the Pennsylvania Turnpike because if would involve both the surrender of long-term state control and ultimately much higher tolls.
After securing a 113% increase in the minimum wage since 1987, I realize that minimum wage workers still live in poverty. Other states have passed us in their determination to reduce poverty, and Pennsylvania's highest potential minimum wage is now only at the bottom of the top half of American states. I am leading the charge to raise Pennsylvania's minimum wage to $9.35 by 2010, with cost of living increases thereafter.
I am an active member of the Speaker's Commission on Legislative Reform, which should wrap up its work in the next month or so. I look forward to being involved in recommendations for a stronger open records law and a law limiting financial contributions along the federal model.
Previously, the Commission and the members of the House have enacted my proposals to place recorded committee testimony on the Internet, to recognize the increasing and long-delayed active participation of a significant number of women in the House and as high-level House staffers by using gender neutral language in the House rules, and to provide links to members on House web pages printing the text of proposed legislation.
A proposal to mandate ethics training for state legislators that I strongly supported is now halfway home, with drafting completed and Commission backing secured.
Yesterday I was appointed the Democratic House member in charge of Real I.D. legislation for the House Governmental Affairs Committee. The federal Real I.D. program raises huge issues of civil liberties and unfunded mandates.
I intend to be a state representative as long as the voters in my district want me to continue to serve them. I totally oppose term limits because they work to dumb down the legislature and they vastly increase the domination of the governor's office and big-money special interests and bureaucrats. Many, many hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians are qualified to serve in the legislature, but there is a vast amount of information that must mastered to be effective. Long-term service is almost always key to gaining the mastery of relevant knowledge needed to have a meaningful impact.
I believe term limits have little support in either the House or the Senate. The fact that the voters defeated roughly two dozen incumbents in 2006 shows the viability of the electoral process. It simply is not true that incumbents are certain to win re-election against good challengers.
Mcdphilly is one of a small group of people who find legislation interesting. I strongly hope that number will grow over time.
In this session, I am leading efforts to raise the minimum wage to $9.35 by 2010; to get the Women, Infants, and Children program funded by the federal government some state money for nutrition education; to mandate that cigarettes sold in Pennsylvania must be the kind that stop burning after not not being smoked, so that they are less likely to cause fires; to create a pro-active role in the Department of Health for exposing cancer clusters; to expand the city of Philadelphia's targeted crime prevention efforts aimed at those young people who have the greatest potential of becoming murderers or other serious criminals; and to get Pennsylvania into an interstate compact of states that will pledge, once they constitute an electoral college majority, to vote for the popular vote winner of Presidential elections.
As a member of the Speaker's Commission on Legislative Reform, I have already pushed through initiatives to place House committee testimony on the Internet; to recognize the important presence of women in all phases of House operations by re-writing the rules in gender neutral language; and to link House internet page publication of proposed legislation with House member email addresses for improved public access.
I was also a major force for getting the Commission to vote to support mandatory ethics training for legislators--a proposal which is now midway through the legislative process.
I strongly support Commission recommendations of further reforms, such as campaign finance limits similar to those of the federal government and improved open records legislation.
Within the budget process, I support greater funding for mass transit across the state, and greater aid to Philadelphia and other communities for education and crime prevention.
As a member of the State Government Committee, I will continue to be active in issues of governmental reform, improving the elections process, regulating Philadelphia Waterfront development, and preserving citizens right to sue for damages.
As a member of the Intergovermental Affairs Committee, I will be continue to be active in pressuring the federal government to work for the interests and values of Pennsylvania citizens, in everything from continuing federal funding for the Children's Health Insurance Program to dealing with whatever foreign policy concerns of Pennsylvania citizens can command a majority of the House.
As a member of the Agriculture Committee, I will continue to work for both safe pet food (pet food is regulated by the Department of Agriculture) and an end to cruel practices of dog breeders (also regulated by the Department of Agriculture).
In the course of a legislative session, I am involved with many hundreds of bills and amendments, and I welcome (indeed I hope for) input from readers of this site and members of the young philly politics community.
d
I'll say thanks for the reply
and keep it at that.
Or, I have some questions:
Or, I have some questions: What do you do to support progressive politics? I know you vote the right way. But, you are in the House Leadership, correct? Could you talk about what your recruitment process is like?
Do you think it helps or hurts the cause when people like Bill Rieger are left in office for years and years?
Dan--you raise an important
Dan--you raise an important point here. Voting the right way is not always indicative of a good representative. I'd rather disagree 10% of the time with my rep. but have her actually pass some legislation.
Babette Josephs is not Bill
Babette Josephs is not Bill Rieger, however.
That is correct. They have
That is correct. They are two different people.
Successful Candidates Are Almost Always Self-Starters
Successful candidates for the legislature are almost always self starters. Running a campaign for the legislature takes massive amounts of time, energy, thought, money, outreach and so forth, and it is a very rare successful candidate who entered the race persuaded by someone else to run. Bob Brady, pushed into the race by allies, is an example of what normally happens to drafted candidates: they get creamed.
I have strongly encouraged people in Republican districts to consider running for the legislature. Those who have won in Republican districts, however, have been those who have entered the race at their own initiative.
The only time I was able to persuade an ultimate winner to run was in an open seat situation in a Democratic primary. I persuaded a former legislator well-liked in his district (he had carried it big in his narrowly losing race for the State Senate)to seek another term in the House.
Basically, people who are contacted and urged to run want guarantees of financial support before they commit to run. The Democratic Party simply does not have the resources to make such guarantees to long-shot candidates.
Bill Rieger represented a low-income district for 40 years because he was attentive to the needs of many of his candidates of his constituents. He shunned public relations activities to his detriment, but for many years was a source of genuine help to people who needed it. He was inarticulate in public speaking, but very articulate in private advice he gave to colleagues and constituents.
It certainly would aid the image of any group of people if every member of the group would be a paragon of perfection. In the real world, however, members of Congress, state legislators, City Council members, lawyers, doctors, teachers, journalists, blacks, whites, Latinos, Asians, gays, men, women, parents, guardians, husbands, wives, etc. have to deal with the fact that some members of their group do things that are wrong. People in whatever group should be judged as individuals, not on the basis of the collective image of group members.
And those who seek to judge others should recognize that others also judge them. Those who set forth extremely high standards for others meet tend to be harshly judged when it turns out that they cannot meet their standards either. The decline of Newt Gingrich is a perfect example of what can happen to someone who believes that high standards only exist for others to meet.
Peeing on my shoes and telling me its raining
Mark-
Do you really think we are that dumb? That we are just these stupid kids who cannot read?
Bill Rieger's problem was that he wasn't good at public relations? Were you laughing so hard that you had trouble typing those words?
For those who don't know, here is a little history on Bill "the invisible man" Rieger:
Tom Ferrick, March 8, 2006:
Rieger represented a district that saw a lot of white flight, including... Bill Rieger!
Only trouble was, he kept his seat.
Ferrick also notes that Rieger rarely actually attended meetings, etc., and was known as the invisible man:
Rieger was also well known for stuffing pieces of paper into his voting machine, so it would look like he was there when he wasn't- ie, ghost voting.
OK, OK, but, at least he ran an honest operation, right? Oh, wait...
Hey, as Mark can tell you- $115,000 would not make a dent in Philadelphia's school deficit. I mean, that might seem like a strange smokescreen to distract from corrupt officials, but hey, that would not make a dent in Philadelphia's school deficit!
So, how did the guy hold onto his seat? Well...
Wait a minute, that sounds crazy! Surely the machine couldn't be doing everything to keep an ineffective, invisible politician in office, could they?
In fact, in his last win, in 2004, we see exactly how Rieger won (Daily News, April 30, 04):
Wait, so you mean one of the leaders of the Philly Party helped keep him office? Wow, that is just nuts. Oh, and then there was this:
It might also shock everyone to know that each of these two guys were rumored to be recruited by the party. One of them lived in goddamned New Jersey, and the other lived in Philly, but not in the district.
Bottom line Mark, is this: If you want to disagree with what I, or someone else on this blog says, go for it. But do not keep shoveling the BS that you have done for the last few days. Have a little common courtesy and respect for us.
Oh, and if you think criticizing someone like Rieger is the same as Newt Gingrich criticizing Clinton for having an affair, while having an affair, then... Lets just say "the terrorists have won."
Dan, that's not fair
You're talking about information from newspapers. Had this all been in a book, then St. Rep. Cohen could have purchased it at taxpayer expense and read all about it.
My my, have we no manners
One of the problems with posting is the smarkiness of people. I doubt you would ever say something like that to Rep. Cohen's face. btw Adam B., what did you do to raise the minimum wage, increase funding for SEPTA, get more money for our schools, try to get guns off the streets, or any of the myriad of issues that Rep. Cohen has worked on since he has been in office. That was a cheap, smarky shot and makes you, not him, look small.
I've said worse to people
His support of Rieger, continuing to this day, is shameful.
I'm 34. Without bragging *too* much, I'm probably more responsible than anyone else for making sure that sites like this one can exist free of government regulation, that nothing anyone says here counts as an in-kind contribution to a campaign, that the owners of this site aren't considered to have formed a political committee because they've spent money on a site which promotes political candidates and instead their actions are treated just as free from regulation as the Inquirer's decision to endorse a candidate.
Give me a few more decades, and we'll see what else I've done. Back to Rieger...
Bill Rieger Is Retired From Politics and Seriously Ill
Bill Rieger is retired from politics and government and is seriously ill. He is a few months short of 85 years old and his life expectancy is not very great. His wife has passed away.
I am not in the business of attacking people I have known and worked with. I very rarely attack anyone at all.
I am interested in using the powers of government to help people. I am interested in encouraging others to do the same thing.
I identify with this site because there are people who participate in who have devoted a substantial amount of time over many years working to improve politics, government, and the lives of our citizens.
I do not identify with anger, hatred and booby traps. I am not interested in being asked to comment on people for the purpose of being denounced for not attacking them. That is not a decent way to treat any person.
I would respectfully request that this whole dialogue be stricken.
I am sorry that Bill Rieger
I am sorry that Bill Rieger is sick. But that does not change that the last 20 years of his career were shameful, and so was the support he got from the City party.
What you don't seem to get is that this:
...is harmed by supporting politicians who don't do their job, who are corrupt, etc. If you want to make people believe in government, then supporting those who take advantage of the public is probably not the best way to go about it.
Again, I Am Not A Punching Bag
I responded innocently to a question. The question did not include any specific facts about Rieger. Nor did it contain any mention of his aide and her criminal difficulties or his disputed residency.
If you wish to send the message that the price of answering your questions is personal abuse, you will find fewer and fewer people willing to answer your questions.
Really? I asked whether you
Really? I asked whether you thought it helped or hurt the cause when people like Bill Rieger are the representatives of our City. You responded that he had a public relations problem.
I Define Myself on the Basis of Whom I Help
I define myself on the basis of how I work to improve people's lives.
I am not a policeman or prosecutor. It is not my mission to denounce or harass individuals, especially individuals who are in no position to do anyone any harm at the current time.
If this means you or anyone else cannot support any or all of my legislative initiatives and any or all of my future political efforts, I will still sleep very well at night.
The honorable Representative's description of Rep. Rieger's
poor reputation (no-show voting, living outside his district, self-dealing, renting office space from his employee etc. etc. etc.) as being a "public relations" problem is priceless.
Bill Rieger was also a ward
Bill Rieger was also a ward leader for a ward he did not live in for years. I worked with most of the ward leaders in that area, most if not all of his committeepeople, I never met Bill Rieger, and did not know anybody who had. Not on any election, nor issue advocacy. His staff was completely inattentive to the Latinos who lived in that district and mildly attentive to his own committeepeople (and he had some pretty good ones.)
The district is extremely poor, has (had prior to redistricting) large numbers of Latinos with no voice, and Rieger took the pay as their representative but had not lived around them for years. Remember when 8th and Butler was the biggest drug spot in the City, that's blocks away from where his office was and where he said he lived.
He passed very little legislation in the last 20 years, and sponsored even less.
To say it is a "public relations" problem was better than priceless.
But remember Rieger was one of the most senior democrats, if not the most senior, in the history of the House. So, his colleagues colluded to keep his seniority in (i.e., not just ward leaders the entire Philadelphia delegation.) But more importantly, think of what a very motivated state rep with that kind of seniority could have done for his district. (Think of Dwight's focus on 8th and Butler.)
I don't believe in attacking elected officials either, and I am saddened to hear of his most recent illness -- he has been ill for a while -- but if an elected official is not living up to basic responsibilities -- attending sessions in Harrisburg, voting, etc., than folks are correct to point out his record. That's part of the trust that politicians are delegated by the voters.
Out with the Old in with the New
That District is very lucky to have Tony Payton, Jr., as the new State Representative. Now the citizens and their needs can be truly represented in Harrisburg. But don't forget that the party opposed him even when he was the only democrat on the ballot. Those most vocal in their opposition of Mr. Payton now have legal issues of their own....see the front page of today's DN.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
— Margaret Mead
Seth
Here is a link to the
Here is a link to the article that Seth is talking about:
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/local/20070523_Big_plans_-_bigger_fall.h...
Now that the primary is over, one of the most important things that progressives can do is support Tony Payton. He is an emerging leader in progressive politics and will undoubtably face a primary challenger. We've got to have his back!
---
Check out my blog!
Great Point Ben !
Right after last year's primary, I actively began helping Tony raise money for the baseless legal battle he was forced to wage to keep a seat he earned through hard work and dedication. It would have been great for some of the progressive leaders in the State House to openly support Tony's efforts after the May Primary. It was an open seat !!! Doesn't matter. But Ben's point about continuing to help Tony does matter. He will be challenged. And we will be there again for him because we believe that what he brings to the table is much much more than simply being an "incumbent". He is active in his representation. He has already put his District on the map and gained the respect of House leadership. I am not making this stuff up. Sure, we will be asked to support him because he is the incumbent. But, I think we have many more real reasons to help Tony and others like him because he knows there is a big difference between earning your seat and holding on to. The sense of entitlement we see over time in elected officials is troubling. I do not see that in officials like Tony, Brian Lentz, Cherrele Parker, Josh Shapiro and many others who realize they need to earn their seat every single day. When the House is not in session, I see these people working-attending neighborhood and community events. While some go window shopping, these people are working. Away from their families, away from their friends. Ben could not be more on point. Tony has and will continue to have my support. I hope you will add him to your list of people you support!
Larry