I attended the first At-Large City Council candidates forum last week and was struck by a) the amazing progressive energy and potential for improving the city we will have this spring, and b) the lack of female representation from the candidates.
I had been thinking about this recently because of discussions I've had with friends about the lack of outspoken, powerful women in politics here. There are some outstanding examples, but it is 2006 already and we should be doing a lot better in terms of diversity.
It is more than a numbers game, but 1 of 15 at-large candidates (so far), is pretty bad. And a quick look around: 7 of 17 councilpersons, 1/3rd of "connectors, 3 out of 10 'most powerful', shows it is not an aberration.
For the folks my age (under 40) it is a sunnier outlook. I think there are as many or more active and outspoken women in the networks I frequent than men. But is this true? Or just my white-male perception. So two questions for any and all:
1) Is the young, progressive community more diverse than old philly politics? If not what can we do?
2) Why isn't there more diversity in the philly elected? Is it still an old-boys network?
Personally, as a white male, I'm not sure what my part in all of this is. And to answer my own question I think we have a ways to go.
There is a lot of talk about 'reform' and progressive change right now. But as progressives if this isn't a diverse movement then I think we need to go back to the drawing board.
Recent comments
5 hours 43 min ago
1 day 6 hours ago
1 day 6 hours ago
1 day 6 hours ago
1 day 6 hours ago
1 day 6 hours ago
1 day 7 hours ago
1 day 7 hours ago
1 day 7 hours ago
1 day 7 hours ago