- 'An End to the Southern Strategy, But No Post-Racial America' says David Love
- "A Question of Place": An essay on the power of community
- Just Equally Speaking….
- Eagles owe Philadelphia the 8 million it needs to keep libraries open
- who would like to see Verizon offer cable TV in Phila?
- Council Committee Passed the Freeze
- Carol Campbell Passes Away
- My first trip to the public library
- Fight digital exclusion
- What if half of Philadelphia didn't have roads?
City Council to hold hearings June 5, 2007 2 p.m. Proposed Charter Change
Submitted by joyce5701 on Thu, 05/31/2007 - 3:14pm.
An ordinance providing for the submission to the qualified electors of the City of Philadelphia an amendment to the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter creating the office of the Handicapped and Disabled Advocate has been introduced by Councilwoman Carol Ann Campbell. Hearings are scheduled for June 5, 2007 at 2 p.m.
If any of you know persons who would like to testify on this proposed Charter change, pro or con, please have them contact the Councilwoman's office at 215 686-3417 or call Joyce Eubanks at 215 769-7648. The specific bill is 070395, and it can be viewed on City Council's website or Hallwatch.











Bureaucracy special no. 2
It's not like we don't have offices to handle this. A few more curb cuts and elevators throughout the city would be better than this feel good-do nothing legislation. I hope that Council denies this proposal.
You may be right
but why don't you back that up?
Joyce was a YPP endorsed candidate and I am happy that she is blogging here post-election. If you have a concern with the legislation she is backing, have the courtesy to treat her like the intellectual equal she is and explain your rationale for disagreeing.
I don't know much about this issue myself, but saying that "a few more curb cuts and elevators throughout the city" would be helpful, when i know that the entire city-owned West Philadelphia trolley system and trolley subway has no ramps, elevators or handicapped equipped vehicles seems like a pretty big issue to me.
You are wrong
and you are most insensitive to the needs of the disabled and the handicapped. Ray is correct regarding the inaccessible nature of the trolley system.
There is a Commission on Person with Disabilities or some such creature. Commissions are creations of the Mayor and can therefore be dissolved by the Mayor. Many if not most of the progressives in this area, including the Legal Clinic for the Disabled, the Disabilities Rights Network, Liberty Resources Inc, Center for Independent Living, and many individual disabled persons all believe that there needs to be this type of mechanism to make a reality for them the promise of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
Persons with disabilities are second class citizens without a voice and many of us, such as you, do not even realize the inequality, because we take for granted so much. You sarcastically say that a few more curb cut and elevators would be better. You cannot possibility mean to reduce the right of the disabled to equal access to curb cuts and more elevators.
Yet, I am sure you know nothing about the curb cuts through the City. I am sure that you do not know how much struggle was involved in securing the funding for the curb cuts and how the Mayor at that time fought tooth and nail to prevent curb cuts. I am also sure you are not aware that many of the curb cuts in Center City are defective , in that the gradient is too steep resulting in puddles of water-no drainage, and ice. I suppose your position is that the disabled should be happy that the curb cuts are there at all and do not complain about the defective nature.
And once we secure the curb cuts and more elevators, what and when do we deal with the taxi cabs that refuse to stop and pick up a disabled person with a wheelchair or other assistive devices? And when do we begin to secure or insure that City Hall and the Municipal Services Building is accessible to the disabled? And when do we deal with housing,employment and employment related issues, and what about defective products, such as motorized wheelchairs that costs thousands of dollars and there is no recourse in Philadelphia for a "lemon chair". And least we forget the untold numbers of disabled and/or handicapped school age children. WE are all so concerned about quality of life issues, but are we really? Whose quality of life? I think you need to step back and reevaluate your response. You are able to pick up and go anytime you want, without any barriers to your going, any place you want, any building that you want to go into. You are able to hop on any trolley, eat in any cafe, grab a drink anywhere and as quiet as it is kept, vote without physical barriers to your voting. I have only scratched the surface in my rebuke of your sarcastic response.
This City is made up of many different types of people, able bodied and disabled, among them. As I said, I believe you should check yourself.
Other than not being
Other than not being disolvable by the mayor, what would this do that the current commission can't?
-----------------------------------------------------------
"yes adam gave some informative comments but he also seems to sprinkle a little adam dust on it." - merkin
Advocates 100% on behalf of the handicapped/disabled community
The Mayor’s Commission on People with Disabilities (MCPD) was formally established by City Council to provide a forum for the disability community to express interest and opinions on city programs and services... it further provides technical assistance to the Mayor and his administration on disability-related matters.
To the extent possible, the idea is for there to be an agency devoted soley as an advocate for the disabled community-not a creation of the Mayor or an advisor to the Mayor's Office.
Again, what would it do the
Again, what would it do the current commission can't?
-----------------------------------------------------------
"yes adam gave some informative comments but he also seems to sprinkle a little adam dust on it." - merkin
Yes - while I may understand
Yes - while I may understand some healthy skepticism of motives any legislator - to so dismissively characterise the needs of so many citizens is not in anyway progressive. Hell - it's not even compassionate conservative. Nor do curb cuts address the needs of those who are blind, developmentally disabled, autistic or deaf.
Many Philadelphians with disabiities face difficulties with even accessing needed city services, are left out of economic development plans and face immense barriers to employment. Even web sites (the cities, the library in the past & perhaps even this one) don't consider ADA compliance.
I don't know if this change is the best step forward - and I think the input of the existing Commission is very much needed on that issue - but thank god someone is bringing it up.
No Shortage of Advocates for Tax Cuts
There are no shortage of advocates for tax cuts.
Yet, amazingly, there is a tremendous shortage of advocates for substantive changes to benefit the disabled and other groups of low-income citizens.
Going by voting returns, Philadelphia is one of the most liberal places in America, but going by who actually contacts elected officials and what they say to elected officials, Philadelphia often may as well as be a rural Republican stronghold.
All too often, the desperation to survive of our many non-profit organizations silences their voices and limits their advocacy efforts to money for their next year's budget.
I think all of us should hear a lot more frequently than we do from advocates for the disadvantaged. The proposal for an advocacy office is a limited step forward, which is better than not moving forward.
I agree with your comments
and I believe the Commission will be participating in these Hearings.
I'm intimately familiar with
I'm intimately familiar with the office of vocational rehabilitation (a state office), the substantial funding that the school district spends for children with special needs and the exponentially growing budget for Therapeutic Support Staff (TSS) in the school district and the extend to which DHS supports mental ill patients throughout the city, and I'm sure there are many other programs throughout the city to help those who are disabled. As much as some of these program need to be examined and improved, funding almost any of them would be better than creating a new office. I think that City Council can do better than create new offices, especially when it is almost certain that city government will be shrinking over the next few years, no matter what anyone says they want to accomplish.
In addition, if anyone pushing for one of these new offices or their friends end up with a job in the new office, let's just say I'll be even more skeptical of their intentions.