The Ex-Offender Program and Magic Bullets

"Perhaps, if we adequately invested in our children and in education, kids who now grow up to be criminals could become productive workers and taxpayers... Today, the United States has the highest rate of childhood poverty of any major country and, year after year, we grossly underfunded childcare, Head Start and the overall needs of our children.

-US Senator Bernie Sanders, responding to a report that 1 in every 99 Americans, including 1 in every 9 African-American men between the ages of 20 and 34, is currently in jail.

Monica Yant-Kinney wrote a column this weekend on Ronald Cuie, the head of Philadelphia's new deputy mayor in charge of the Office for the Reentry of Ex-Offenders.

She notes the tasks of the office:

Created by Mayor John F. Street, the Mayor's Office for Reentry has served nearly 3,000 former inmates since 2005, teaching them everything from how to pay bills to why not to lie on job applications.

Many of the clients have been out and foundering for years. Cuie wants prisons to allow his caseworkers to start training inmates for work before they are released.

The reentry office commits to mentoring ex-offenders for 18 months. That, plus a new $10,000 tax credit businesses can receive for hiring former inmates, may sway wary employers to take a chance on an unproven workforce.

Without question, it is a hugely important role, and I really give the Mayor credit for getting that. I spent some time interning in the field of employment law, and the role criminal records play in denying people jobs is immense. Trying to get the business community on board, as Nutter as done with talks in front of the Chamber of Commerce and others, is very smart.

Jennifer wrote about this topic not long ago though, and I think it is important to return to something she mentioned when talking about Cuie:

As it was, he spent only three years in prison for his conviction ("robbery, aggravated assault, unlawful restraint, false imprisonment and criminal conspiracy"). Presumably when he got out, he had at least some of the safety net that a once-high-ranking city official is likely to have.

This all makes him pretty atypical of the people coming out of prison and back to Philly neighborhoods. He's clearly spent time and energy since his release devoted to helping make systemic changes in the prison and re-entry systems. Hopefully he will serve as a literal bridge to those in power who think they are detached from the problems of those in prison, those getting out, and their families. And hopefully he has come to understand the huge structural obstacles people who aren't deputy mayors face when they have to restructure a life after incarceration.

In other words, the office is not giving people second chances if they never had a legitimate first chance, at least as most of us would understand it.

The reality is that many people growing up in our City and Country have had very little chance at all. That is not something the Mayor by himself can change (Clinton, Obama: Please beat McCain.). But it is to note that even with some mentoring and a potential 10k tax credit, the large majority of people coming out of prison are likely under-educated, to say the least. And they are still entering a market that lacks good paying jobs, whether you have a record or not.

All of this is not to denigrate what the Mayor is doing or how important a well-functioning office for re-entry is. It is to note just how large a hole that we have dug ourselves into as a City and Country. It is going to take an amazing effort on both the national and local level to even think about climbing out of it. The 10k tax-credit is incredibly important, but, it is no magic bullet.

Tax credits don't fix lives

All a tax credit can do is overcome some of the barriers to hiring ex-cons, it can't prepare folks for life on the outside. So many folks going through re-entry have not held ordinary jobs in years, have no experience, have anger and substance-abuse issues. Its really about programs that prepare people returning to society to make a succesful transition but those programs cost money.

The truth is that money is typically pennies on the dollar against failure in terms funding the cost of recidivism in terms of law enforcement, court costs and re-incarceration - not to mention the human costs of lives destroyed.

Does anyone have any good concrete stats/studies on the cost of treatment and "life skills" costs versus the costs of recidivism?
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.

I doubt that the ex-offender

I doubt that the ex-offender program is really geared towards people with severe drug addictions, still-angry violent offenders, people with mental health issues, or career criminals. It is primarily for people who, but for their convictions, would be hirable employees, and for people who are genuinely interested in turning their lives around.

As we've noted many, many times, the war on drugs has snared a great many of such people. The point is to keep a petty conviction from becoming, effectively, a life sentence. We need poverty programs to combat poverty, anti-violence programs to combat violence, and mental health programs to combat mental health. This is a parolee/ex-con employment program to help solve the problem of parolee and ex-con employment. It also has the salutary effect of changing/complicating our discussion of the prison population from scary men who want to rob and kill us to seeing them as an astonishingly large group of people whom society fails and continues to fail. It is a spur, not a substitute.

sure

And I get the point of your second paragraph, but I think that between this group:

I doubt that the ex-offender program is really geared towards people with severe drug addictions, still-angry violent offenders, people with mental health issues, or career criminals.

And this group:

It is primarily for people who, but for their convictions, would be hirable employees, and for people who are genuinely interested in turning their lives around.

...that there is a much bigger group you are leaving out.

People who don't have severe drug addictions, who don't have mental health issues, etc, but who also are products of crappy schools, who do not have a ton of job skills, etc., and so still face a job market where there are very little options for them.

Oh yes

I was trying to poke the straw man on the other side, not create one of my own. For this bigger group in between, the jobs program is an imperfect fit -- some people it will work quite well for, others hardly at all, and for some still it might help, but not enough.

By the way, did I really type "a great many of such people"? And then press "Post comment"? I hope that it's an editorial remnant. Yuck.

Thanks for calling me a

Thanks for calling me a "straw man". I think that folks tend to come out a lot worse for wear psychologically after incarceration than when they go in and I am as a result pretty skeptical of "rehabilitation" going on in PA's prison system. I do acknowledge that there are in fact 3 groups, but I think both you and Dan might be soft-selling the psychological scars of even short timers coming out of serving state time. I have friend who did Federal time for selling acid while in college and while he was definitely the exception, not the rule, my friend still seems to have come out with more problems than he went in with.

Crappy schools help create the problem but I think its foolish to think anybody who has served enough time to go to state prison as opposed to local jails doesn't likely need a little help jumping back into the "real world" under the best of circumstances.

-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.

Hi, Sean. You, yourself are

Hi, Sean. You, yourself are not a straw man at all. But I think this picture of the kind of long-term problems all ex-prisoners face is a bit more nuanced than what you first laid out. I'm also uncertain whether anyone really thought of the new offender re-entry programs as a cure-all rather than a much-needed focused part of a broader effort to slow crime, add jobs, and fight poverty and its attendant ills.

I hope the office of ex-offenders includes psychological and social counseling in addition to employment counseling as part of the 18 months of mentoring they've committed to.

And I think we're all in agreement -- we need to focus our reform efforts on the causes of crime, the institutions of justice (police, courts, jails, probation, etc.), and getting ex-offenders the support they need to readjust to civilian life, including finding work.

So what you're saying is...

It's nice that they're focusing on "re-entry" but they can't forget about "entry."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content