- 'An End to the Southern Strategy, But No Post-Racial America' says David Love
- "A Question of Place": An essay on the power of community
- Just Equally Speaking….
- Eagles owe Philadelphia the 8 million it needs to keep libraries open
- who would like to see Verizon offer cable TV in Phila?
- Council Committee Passed the Freeze
- Carol Campbell Passes Away
- My first trip to the public library
- Fight digital exclusion
- What if half of Philadelphia didn't have roads?
Knox proposes a way to help give healthcare to the uninsured.
Submitted by raideradam on Tue, 03/20/2007 - 1:48pm.
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/local/Knox_plans_health_centers_to_treat...
Obviously I don't know the numbers if it is feasible, but seems rather simplistic.
Having mostly nurse practitioners with doctor oversight seems like a good, cost effective, solution to handle this.











Knox's healthcare plan
It's a great idea, and I would love to work at one of these sites. I am a primary care physician. It is the future of primary care, and dovetails with Rendell's healthcare reform proposals.
It represents what Knox brings to the table: outside the box proposals that bypass red tape. It does not make me feel any more comfortable with him being my mayor.
I say elect Nutter (or any of the other bright men who have shown they are dedicated to public service) for mayor and encourage him to put this qualified former insurance executive (Knox) in charge of this interesting project.
Supporting Michael Nutter for Mayor
Political Doc
Knox and health care and contracts
Will Mayor Knox be able to give himself no-bid health care contracts like Deputy Mayor Knox had under Rendell?
There weren't any.
However, there were certainly no-show jobs for Bob Brady... and possibly other members of his family. Hmmm.
Kenney's Comment
Susan, if there were no contracts, what contracts were Councilman Kenney referring to in his post on Sunday? He usually is well informed..
In this case, not so well informed.
My experience with Mr. Kenney is, eh, not so much. He was quoted in the Evening Bulletin complaining that we treated everyone to dinner at Moonstruck, a very nice restaurant in Fox Chase, when all we did was use their upstairs banquet hall.
I asked the councilman to be specific about any illegal or inappropriate deals he knew of, what other parties were involved and why he hasn't come forward with the allegation until now. I'm waiting for him to get back to me with that information.
Knox and Youngblood
Susan, glad you're back! You confident of that? That none were received by 3rd parties that then hired Knox's group??? Also, since you're back, we're waiting for an answer on what Michael Youngblood's role is in the campaign and what his relationship with Knox is? Thanks!
To be fair to my boy Tom Knox
This seems like a very good idea. If this wasn't my ghost week on YPP I would write a little more.
But, still, good idea.
Huh?
Wait Dan, what's a good idea?
I'm going o go out on a limb
I'm going o go out on a limb and guess the article he replied to.
Yes. The title of the post.
Yes. The title of the post.
Here's The Article Knox's Idea Is From
I mean, I am guessing.
Inquirer, March 12: Now: Fast, affordable health clinics (on the increase in small for-profit health clinics inside supermarkets and drug stores)
I think any increased access to the (nearly free) clinic system would certainly help--it's horrifying that there's such a waiting list for the existing clinics--but I do wonder about the feasibility in terms of funding. What's the deal with the idea that insured people are going to use these places and subsidize the uninsured? Do the insured people not have access to other services--why would they choose to visit somewhere staffed mostly without full doctors? How would you control the balance of types of clients?
Here's the part of the article detailing profitability in the private clinics.
Interestingly, the company running the for-profit clinics plans to expand to Philadelphia. Would the city be using a private company to run the clinics, or doing it themselves?
Jennifer
Jennifer, while this is the same idea Tom's proposing...
He first talked to me about it in some detail back in December. So no, it's not a spur of the moment thing he snagged from a newspaper article.
Cool, yeah, I was guessing
I'm sure it has been talked about in the industry for a while.
Do you have any thoughts on my questions based on the discussions that have gone on within the campaign?
Jennifer
I wasn't in on the financial discussion...
But I think it's probably something where the city would be encouraging the insured to use it.
Hey Susan,
Since you're taking questions:
Howard Eskin is a dope and a moron, and he's hardly ever right on sports let alone politics - but I heard him ranting just now and you know what, he's right; this whole thing were Knox is loaning himself the money to finance his campaign stinks.
Knox's basic platform is that he's taking the "for sale" sign down; so, how does he justify this nifty financial maneuver? Has he vowed to not solicit funds to "pay himself back?"
There's been discussion of unequal outrage at YPP - and I think the outrage on this issue hasn't been hyped enough. I'd love to vote for an outsider, but the potential for same old, same old with Knox trading influence for funds is just too big an obstacle to overlook.
So, when's he going to make that vow, Susan?
Oddly enough I thought this
Oddly enough I thought this thread was about health care.
Good point. Sorry for the
Good point. Sorry for the "hijacking," but I wanted to get that question in somewhere.
Well, the hours proposed
Well, the hours proposed sure beat the hell out of any doctor office I know. If I think I have the flu or a cold and just need a prescription, I would feel safe enough going to the clinic after work as opposed to having to take a day off of work to be told I have the flu.
Also, health care insurers may encourage people to go there.
As an example (this is my thought, not something I read), the co-pay is $7.50 and the insurance company is billed $55 by the center (as Knox proposed through bargaining). Assume a normal doctor visit for me would run $120 and I have a co-pay of $20.
What if your insurance provider said "go to the health center and we will waive your co-pay"?
The insurance company saves $45 ($120-55-20) and I save $20.
The trick is that Knox's projected numbers would be correct and I am not just paying out the other side with taxes because the City is keeping the center afloat.