Tell Rendell: Call a halt to licensing of casinos

Send fax at: http://www.hallwatch.org/faxbank/optrans

(please forward widely)

Dear Friends and Allies,

Please take a few minutes and send a fax to Governor Rendell asking him to delay the licenses for one year. Most of us are very busy and have little time to feel we can have an impact, however, taking a few minutes over the weekend to write a fax to Governor Rendell will make a difference today.

Casino Free Philadelphia's campaign Operation Transparency, has organized two busloads of dedicated citizens to go to Harrisburg and publicly search for the casino license application documents. The Pennsylvania Gaming Board has refused to release these documents although it is public information. The collection of faxes will be released on Monday to Governor Rendell's office while this direct action is taking place. By acting together we will demonstrate to Harrisburg our unified organized coalition to stop the licensing of casinos until there is a viable and sustainable plan in place to mediate their impacts.

Thank you for your participation!

To send a fax go to:

http://www.hallwatch.org/faxbank/optrans

For more information on Operation Transparency visit www.casinofreephila.org.

Sent. Anyone else?

Sent. Anyone else?

I'm in. Not as articulate as

I'm in. Not as articulate as I would like for a letter to the Governor. But, he has never been accused of being overly inteligent.

Well not by anyone who has never talked with him

In my experience, during two long group discussions about transit, I found Governor Rendell to be exremely sharp and very well informed about public policy. Everyone I know who has had much more interaction than I have had--including some of the people in his adminstration and some people who would never work for him--says the same thing.

I'm often critical of him. But if he has a problem it is not with brain power.

Vern takes on Casinos

Anastasio Calls for Six-Month Delay on Issuance of Casino Licenses

I thought folks might be interested in know that Vern Anastasio is also taking on the casinos. I know he has sent a fax and will be attending the rally on December 11th.

I should disclose that I am working closely with Vern and hope that he runs for city council.

---
With Foxwoods Facing a $200,000 Fine for Illegal Campaign
Contributions, How Do We Know that this Process Isn't Tainted?

For Immediate Release
December 6, 2006
Contact: Hannah Miller
267-979-7899

PHILADELPHIA - Today, long-time Philadelphia neighborhood advocate
Vern Anastasio called on the State Gaming Board to postpone the
issuance of two Philadelphia gaming licenses for six months.

"Given the controversy surrounding the entire slot parlor process, and
the newfound improprieties with the Foxwoods applicant, the only
responsible thing to do is wait six months before issuing these
licenses," said Anastasio, "so concerned residents can have questions
answered, additional input submitted and concerns addressed."

Two licenses are scheduled to be awarded on December 20, just two
weeks away. As reported in today's Inquirer, casino investors Peter
DePaul and his partners gave out $31,750 in illegal campaign
contributions this year, and are facing stiff penalties.

Anastasio, who served on the Site Selection Committee of the Mayor's
Gaming Task Force, said there were three major reasons why the State
Gaming Board should postpone their decisions.

1. Proper urban planning should be done before massive casino
development begins, Anastasio says. "You don't build first and plan
later. Now that Penn Praxis has been given a mandate to develop an
urban plan for our Delaware Waterfront, the responsible approach would
be to allow them to devise a plan for the waterfront first. Only then
should we consider casino sites on our riverfront."

2 . Additional information provided by casino operators demands
additional public input. Public input was solicited months before
these casino developers submitted all required information about the
size, scope and impact of these casinos. Now that more information is
available, the taxpayers should have ample time to digest this new
information, provide more input and offer alternate sites.

3. More time is needed for the interests of Philadelphia
neighborhoods, small businesses and homeowners to be protected. "For
eight months, no one in City Hall stood up against the State or
against the casino developers and demanded a fair, open and honest
site selection process. Therefore, the taxpayers opposed to these
casino sites need more time to defend themselves against politics as
usual," Anastasio said.

Vern Anastasio is a member of Neighbors Allied for the Best Riverfront
(NABR), a vocal supporter of Casino Free Philadelphia and the first
organizer of civic groups to deal with the neighborhood impacts of
casinos. Anastasio is also a founding board member of Bella Vista
United Civic Association, a community whose boundaries start just six
short blocks from the Delaware River.

For more information and more in-depth discussion of the issues
surrounding slots in Philadelphia, please visit www.vernanastasio.com.

----30----
http://benwaxman.com

One possible answer

I think the nexus is clear. Did city council members lead a high profile effort to prevent the state from enacting the legislation? Why not? Why didn't you?

City council members are expected to be leaders in our community.

What is within our power

The state legislature has taken over control from the City of Philadelphia the school district, the parking authority, the commercial port and have been contemplating an airport takeover. When have they listened to us in the past?

I will and do work hard on lots of things, but some things I cannot prevent due to a lack of statutory authority. District councilmembers did testify at the gaming commission hearings and did send letters and statements of opposition. It is unfair, in my opinion, to lead people to believe that you can do something when you know very well you do not have the authority.

So, when someone claims to be "Taking on the Casinos" it is a sham and done to create a personal, self promoting profile that is just not true. To denegrate the very person in city government (DiCicco)who has actually introduced and passed meaningful legislation to mitigate the negative effects of gaming on neighborhoods, is equally unfair and I think that most people have already seen through this.

I will take a large share of credit for turning Vince Fumo's position around regarding zoning preemption. What "high profile effort", that would have been successful, would you suggest?

Agreed

"having a public profile and being effective do not always go hand in hand."

Certainly, you're right. And all too often, they are negatively correlated. And your point about the state reps is well taken. On the other hand, when deals are quietly being made, and up-front vocal opposition is lacking, and no organizing is apparent, then I think you're likely to get your "nexus."

I will look at politicians that put themselves out front on issues like this with a skeptical eye, no doubt. But have you really used your networks to their full capacity to fight what's going on with respect to the casinos? If so, then great; perhaps you could be more explicit about how you've used your representative power to organize Philadelphians against being railroaded. If not, then explanations that the casino legislation is not part of your pervue, or that realistic compromises need to be made (as Wilson Goode suggested in his posts on the subject), will ring a bit out of tune for me.

Penn Praxis is a good thing.

Penn Praxis is a good thing. But it’s not accurate to say it was the work of one councilman alone. It was also influenced by many other community driven efforts - including the Riverfront 2015 symposium and the good government moves being made by the likes of Vern, Anne Dicker, Ray Murphy, Ed Kirlin, Rene Goodwin and others.

They HAVE been able to make politicians respond at a level that has real influence where, as Councilman Kenney said, City Council cannot. For example, Riverfront 2015 symposium had three state reps on the panel. And they took the findings from the symposium right back to Harrisburg.

And, may I add, other places where city council does have influence – the Penn’s Landing Board for instance – didn’t offer much input to this process. I don't think providing low interest loans to development firms like Vitetta helps the critical issues facing the waterfront...

Also, trashing Vern because he is taking a position on the future of Philly's waterfront stinks of negative grandstanding and is off subject. His press release didn’t mention DiCicco once. And it was someone else – Ben Waxman - who posted it in this thread as a useful contribution. It's not a campaign piece.

I would hope he is well-infor

I would hope he is well-informed re policy. But, having likewise spoken to and heard him speak publically on a range of issues, I have never been terribly impressed.

Casinos Suck

We all agree.

No one on city council voted for them.

The state legislature gave them to us.

No one on city council will determine the ultimate sites.

Vern might denounce them.

It won't matter.

The state gaming commission will not care what Vern says.

Frank DiCicco has tried to position us to have some say in the way these slot parlors effect our neighborhoods.

I think he has done a good job in at least trying to keep us in the game.

I know that these casinos are going to really screw us up, but Frank DiCicco is not the reason we are having this discussion.

At least acknowledge the origination.

After reading this post again, I noticed that Vern's press release mentions Penn Praxis' work on a waterfront development plan.

Who do you think came up with this idea and worked hard to convince the mayor to implement this plan? It was Frank DiCicco.

So let's acknowledge this hard work and vision by replacing him on city council with Vern.

If the centerpiece of Mr. Anastasio's Campaign is the elimination of slot parlors, then he should consider running for the state house or senate. There he could actually try to change the law which brought us slot parlors in the first place.

I really do not see and have not understood the nexus between city council and the enaction of legislation allowing gaming in PA.

The more people speaking

The more they will listen.

"What "high profile effort", that would have been successful, would you suggest?"

As community leaders, I believe that council members should be at the forefront of a very public effort to battle the legislation, and to publicize the likely effects of the casinos being built. You have access to the media. Why wasn't it used more? You have the ability, as a group, to work to unite people from different parts of the city to fight the state wresting control from Philly's citizens. It seems that city council members, in general, have a great deal of influence when it comes to getting people out to vote for them on election day. So, why don't they use that same influence to get people out on an issue such as the casinos? I have had similar questions about why city council members weren't more out front on uniting and rallying Philadelphians against the state dictating our local gun policy legislation.

I find it really hard to judge the veracity of the insinuations about back-room dealing on the casinos issue. You and Goode have both have talked about the realistic limitations of the city council. OK, fair enough.

But I also know this: if you had a higher profile in leading the community on this an other similar issues, then I think your question above about the nexus would be moot. I know I would be less inclined to give credence to allegations that the citizens have been sold out if I saw city council members out in the streets and using their networks to energize on these issues the same way that they are pounding the pavement around election day.

The other issue you're referencing - whether or not any politician or political hopeful posting at YPP is grandstanding on casinos or any other issue - is an interesting and important one. But honestly, I think that issue runs deep, and the same questions can be asked of you as to your motivations to defend what city council has and hasn't done on the casinos issue.

Quiet Deals?

I am not aware of or part of any "quiet deals", so I cannot discuss that with you.

I did explain to you that my many meetings and the entire day I spent is Harrisburg with Fumo, did have a tremendous effect on getting us back our zoning rights. I do not like using the word "I" all the time, so maybe I should be more self-promoting.

Organizing Philadelphians from being railroaded is a bit open ended especially considering I am not the one who railroaded them. It was their representatives in Harrisburg.

For the record, Councilman DiCicco held the first waterfront planning meeting that resulted in the Penn Praxis Process, three years ago. All are needed to make it successful, but give the guy his due. He works hard, is serious and does not deserve to be removed from office.

It's interesting

Maybe I have a different style but having a public profile and being effective do not always go hand in hand. I'll give you an example.

All of the PA State Reps who represent waterfront communities have all been very present at many of these anti-gaming rallies and neighborhood forums expressing concern over the negative effects of gaming on the community. ALL of them voted in favor of Act 71 and ALL of them voted to preempt Philadelphia's Zoning Laws on four occassions

Because they now attend a rally and carry a sign, does that mean that their public profile balances their past actions and votes?

One of the things that angers citizens is this type of hypocrisy.

I can defend what city council has done to mitigate the potential negative effects of gaming, but I cannot control what the state has done to us. There is no mechanism for the council to legislate away slot parlors.

I think that the war in Iraq is wrong and would like to bring all of our people home now. I am not a member of the US Congress and therefore am hamstrung in being effective on this issue.

I think that these slot parlors are the wrong way to go and I have said so here and other places. I have worked on and voted the right way on CITY legislation to help protect our communities.

Since you’re stuck on

Since you’re stuck on talking about DiCicco, why did he wait until 3 years ago to start addressing the waterfront? It remained stagnant for years while he was councilman. And isn’t it true that development on the waterfront only occurs with a resolution from City Council? It’s not like it’s been completely out of his, yours or city councils hands - just the gaming part of it.

And holding a meeting 3 years ago doesn’t compare to all of the efforts by community groups, op-ed’s, rallies, etc. put out and sponsored by Vern, AJ Thompson, Anne Dicker, Bob Blackburn and others that gave this the direction and momentum it has now.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content