- Pennsylvania Among 'Terrible 10' Most Regressive Tax States
- February 4 Non-Partisan Training: HOW TO RUN FOR ELECTION BOARD IN 2013: HOW TO RUN FOR COMMITTEEPERSON IN 2014
- Republican Governors Opt-In to Medicaid Expansion
- The Reports of Unions' Death Are Greatly Exaggerated
- Ask Allyson Schwartz to run for Governor
- Mind the gap: Opting Out of Medicaid Expansion Leaves Low-income Families Behind
- Jan. 14 Workshop:HOW TO RUN FOR ELECTION BOARD IN 2013; HOW TO RUN FOR COMMITTEEPERSON IN 2014
- Seth Williams on Guns, Jasmine Rivera on School Closures @PFC Meetup Wednesday
- PA Revenue Strong Midway Through Year; Tax Cut Could Have Big Impact
- What to Make of the Fiscal Cliff Deal?
Nutter Is Wrong to Reverse His Position on Casinos
Michael Nutter had it right when he was a candidate. He not only actively supported keeping casinos out of neighborhoods he rightly stated that casinos are bad economic development and that he would not use their revenue for government services, no matter how worthy these services are. As a candidate and in his first year as Mayor, Nutter was poised to become a champion, to stand up to the predatory gambling trade and the corrupt governor, Senator, legislature and Supreme Court that has been pushing for years to make Philadelphia the largest US city to host casinos.
After a week of denying that his position had changed, Mayor Nutter finally admitted that it has. In the Daily News article this morning Nutter's spokesperson stated that Nutter's "comments this week on his position on casinos were about his time as mayor, not when he was a candidate." Of course, as the article makes clear Nutter answered "yes" when asked "As mayor I will attempt to keep casinos from being built within Philadelphia" making this explanation from Nutter nonsensical. But the biggest problem here is not that the Mayor's position changed but that he was wrong to change it.
The proposed casinos will create a net economic loss for the city, potentially costing us more than $200 million dollars each year in law enforcement costs alone (Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperative Authority report, 2007). Mayor Nutter, by reversing his position on casinos, has put the city's long term economic future further in jeopardy in a perilous time. And by reversing his position he also threatens other important priorities such as: reducing crime, government transparency (he has now had a number of secret meetings with both casino operators), developing a world-class, sustainable riverfront on the Delaware, preserving the historic resources of our city, and much more.
Nutter is wrong to change his position and wrong to support this regressive form of taxation. He should stand up against predatory gambling and the industry and governor who continue to try to push it into our communities and homes.


I agree with you, Jet
I agree with you, Jet -- what is the best way for the myriad supporters of a city without casinos to articulate their opinion -- backed up by the financial data you are putting forward here -- as this budget process continues? How can readers of this blog support that organizing? I know many folks would want to be a part of helping the city wake up and understand the net financial lost that the city would bear if allowed casinos to be built. Balance sheets are a part of public consciousness more than ever with our city budget struggle, and the time is right to put a strong, defensible set of numbers proving casinos net money losers forward.
--
-----
hannah sassaman
267 970 4007
money talks, and the SS United States
Money talks and evrything else walks...er floats. Tell me why the SS United States cannot be used as a Casino located at Penn's Landing? This ship is historically significant, rates second only to the Titanic in the value of its memorobilia, is already right here in Philly,will provide jobs as it is restored, create a new attraction for Philly tourists, and add hotel rooms. All this while having minimal impact on a neighborhood.
Because its owned by a Malaysian cruise line, silly rabbit
Its not a piece of land owned by any powerful, politically connected real estate or legal interests.
Not like this guy or this guy. If you are going to force a casino on the people of Philadelphia, its important to deliver that very profitable business to somebody local who is already really, really politically connected of course.
-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.
A Nutter Poem
I posted this limerick a few months ago on YPP. Here is a repost for your reading pleasure...
Once there was a man named Nutter
Elected for his strong moral rudder
On gambling I’ve read
The shots 'r called by Big Ed
“Don’t forget who’s cutting your butter.”