- The Mayor...
- Stuff I am reading from around the interwebs
- Supreme Court Hands Tom Corbett an Enourmous Amount of Power to Protect Pennsylvanians. Will he Use it?
- ONE GETS LIFT-OFF ON GLOBAL RECRUITMENT DRIVE AS U2 360 WORLD TOUR OPENS
- The Shrinking of our Shrinking: Will Philly Grow Next Year?
- Don't Cut Loose World's Poorest
- Franken Wins
- Federal Court Enjoins Confidentiality Provision of Ethics Act. Philly Repercussions to Follow?
- Workers Report Back from Fight for Healthcare for All
- Watch out world, here we come
Payroll Employment in Metropolitan Philadelphia
With the national economy showing signs of a recession now would be a good time to review the employment situation in the Philadelphia region.
What if this is as good as it gets?
Wednesday new figures on employment in the region were released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Payroll employment in January increased over the same month a year ago by 11,000 jobs or .6%. Employment growth in January lies somewhat below a post-2001 recession peak of 1.5% achieved in the summer of 2005.

You say groove, I say mojo.
As Mark Zandi of economy.com put it recently the national economy since 2001 “never got its groove back.” In the Philadelphia region employment growth even after 2003 never quite achieved the levels that prevailed in the late 90s. The percentage of the population employed was higher and the unemployment rate was lower in the last three years of the 90s boom (1998-2000) than in what look to be the last three years of the Bush boom (2005-2007).
Bush boom? It is a book, which if you are going to buy perhaps you would consider paying me $2.00 for a gently used copy of this book. I mean come on what else could you buy for $2.00?
Natural and Unnatural Disasters.
Like hurricanes, recessions do not impose the same degree of pain and suffering on every member of our society.
Does past performance predict future performance? Let’s hope not!
The last two recessions each lasted eight months but employment nationally and in the Philadelphia region continued to contract even after the recessions were declared to have run their course. In Philadelphia employment would continue to contract for another 24 months following the end of the 1990-91 recession and for another 31 months following the official end of the 2001 recession. If the U.S. economy is currently in a recession based on recent economic history it may be 2011 before employment in the region begins to grow again.











Price...
I assume these numbers don't reflect those who have dropped out of the job market? Is there reason to assume that percentage as compared to the "unemployed" segment is relatively constant in different periods? Or at least comparable from one recession period to another recession period?
Hi D.E. II, good question
Hi D.E. II, good question as always. I would expect to see more people drop out of the labor force in a recession. The disadvantage of the official unemployment rate as you know is that people must report actively looking for work in the previous four weeks. So as people get discouraged and stop looking for work the official unemployment rate appears to be lower than the real level of joblessness in the economy. The employment rate which is the ratio of the number of people employed to the population is one indirect way of capturing this phenomena because as the economy slows generally the employment rate tends to fall.
You will note however that the employment rate in Metropolitan Philadelphia from 2001-2003 was 61.9%, three tenths of percentage point higher than before the recession (61.6%). Due to the fact that employment in the region kept growing until September of 2001 the employment rate measured from 2001 to 2003 was more or less unchanged. Unemployment rates did rise during 2001-2003 as the number of people in the labor force grew faster than both employment and the population in the region.
Because I can’t seem to write without putting up a picture what follows is the seasonally adjusted employment rate in the United States. As you can see the employment rate started falling after March 2003 (the official peak of the last expansion) and kept falling until September 2003 reflecting the fact that people stopped looking for work as the economy weakened.

Bad News: PA's Employment Situation for February is Out
Private sector payrolls in Pennsylvania declined by 8,400 in February. Nationally private sector payrolls have declined for three consecutive months signaling strongly that we are in a recession. For the geeks here is the news release from the Pennsylvania Department of Labor.
--Mark Price
Not a very good trend
(Nationally) Down 14,000, to down 26,000 to down 101,000 in consecutive months. A short time period - but the increasing rate of growth in joblessness (is there a better way to word that?), doesn't bode well. Maybe not only are we in a recession, but it is deepening?
Yep
It is getting ugly out there.
A perfect GOP economy
If you're already rich, an economy like this is great. If you're not rich, well, f--k you, you don't count.
Or, as Dick Cheney said when told that most people in the US disagreed w/the Iraq war, "so?"
First against the wall when the revolution comes * Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy,
-Z