- Council Committee Passed the Freeze
- Carol Campbell Passes Away
- My first trip to the public library
- Fight digital exclusion
- What if half of Philadelphia didn't have roads?
- You know, let's not even worry about the City Commissioners office messing up voter registration processing
- Bold ideas to fix the budget
- Mayor Nutter's Town Hall Meeting Schedule
- City Releases Library Information to City Council
- Size of Philadelphia government?
A Prayer for the City, 2007 (Hannah Miller's version) Part 1.
For months now, I have been trying to figure out how to tell the world who Michael Nutter is, or what he represents, or why he is so important at this juncture in our city’s history. Part of the reason I could never start was because it was so incredibly complicated to explain.
When I talked to folks outside of politics I found that they had never heard of Michael Nutter. A congressperson (since we have two in the race) represents on average 647,000 voters; a city councilman in Philadelphia has only about 100,000 constituents, which makes it a lot harder to run for mayor.
I kept tripping up when I talked to people. I never knew how to tell his story.
Part of the problem with telling Michael’s story is that in order to understand how great of a gift he was already been to this city, one must see clearly the way that power is organized and used - how limited is the vision of most of those that have power – how stifling is the system to change and innovation and even humanity towards ordinary people - and how difficult it is, in an environment of control, fealty, and fear, to stand up and advocate for radical changes that might endanger those at whose grace you serve, and therefore, your own career.
Former City Councilman Michael Nutter stands alone in Philly political history as someone who successfully navigated the waters of the party for 16 years while standing up for what was right, again and again, even if it were his own political life on the line. He has shown courage, and determination, and a willingness to go farther than anyone else in order to force City Hall to pay attention to the people it is charged with serving.
In his service on council, Michael Nutter consistently fought for the best interests of all Philadelphians, as opposed to the few. He looked at the task of government the city as a duty, not just a paycheck. He authorized the first, ground-breaking anti-corruption legislation in the city’s history, so that the city can open itself up to growth, new ideas, and a city workforce that does not contain the same 5 last names - while being a popular ward leader and maintaining good relationships within the party at the same time. He redeveloped the blighted parts of his district while authoring citywide legislation – all against the will of the most corrupt city government in America, that fought him every step of the way.
This, my friends, is the balancing act of a lifetime.
And he did it with such talent. Such unbelievable reserves. Such a tremendous amount of hope for what this city could be, and do, what he would be able to do for it, given the opportunity and the vision. A normal person would have probably cowed or given in or given up. But Mike Nutter seems to have in him some absolutely indestructible supernaturally solid titanium container of hope, that can’t be burned, chopped apart, or worn down by the slow grind of human life, the frustration of political compromise, or the despair of watching the city you love slowly sink into a quagmire of inertia, poverty, and drug-based, violent death.
For a city with no expectation that things will ever be different – that the Phillies might ever win - that the Navy Yard might reopen as a port – someone like Michael Nutter almost comes across as a genetic mutation. Not only does he have hope – he knows he has to keep going, even when people can’t be bothered, because it's the only thing he can do. He has no choice.
The skepticism has had no end.
...How did this guy get here?
...Why does he believe in us? Is he crazy?
...What’s his angle? What does he want?
He must want something.
He must want to get rich or something.
All politicians are the same.
--------
The answer is...this one is different.
If you want to, you can get very rich off of being in government.
Mike Nutter drives an Acura and sends his daughter to public school. No interest there.
So what does he want?
I sincerely believe that Michael Nutter wants the city of Philadelphia to be a thriving place where no one lacks for resources, lives in fear, lives a life without opportunity or hope, or finds themselves alone.
I know that other candidates want the same thing. So does our current mayor. We're all Democrats. We're all liberals. Do a poll. We all want the same things.
The difference between Michael Nutter and everyone else is that he figured out why these things are not happening. Why so little has changed for years and years. Why so little has changed despite the fact that we all want jobs and education and an end to the killing and so on...
Michael Nutter figured out that city hall cannot be the tool of change unless it, as a tool, actually works. And right now, the way things are set up, our city government is completely powerless to take any bold action on any of our massive, sweltering, nasty social problems. Right now, it's just a bunch of people fighting over a few hundred jobs and their pensions. It's not a functioning government at all. Every once in a while, to appease a reporter, they do something almost lucidrously impotent, like ban trans fats. That's the silly stuff, but the problem is when you get to truly disturbing moments like the housing agency reorg battle. (We have a lot of different housing agencies, and a lot of different people want to merge them or change them.) This is a major issue in Philadelphia, that needs serious interest, but instead of actually looking out for the people who need affordable housing, pols just fought over whose fiefdom was going to lose jobs.
This was Michael Nutter's workplace. For 16 years.
--
(to be continued)











Nutter: For a City Government that Works
Hannah:
I couldn't agree more and can't wait to read the rest.
Michael Nutter is the one candidate in this race who has a vision of what Philadelphia can be and how to get there. He's the one who is offering more than just tired platitudes and ethnic pandering.
He's the one person in this race who has anything on the line--Knox is independently wealthy and the rest have jobs.
Michael Nutter continues his classy campaign focusing on the issues because that is what Philadelphia voters deserve.
Michael Nutter is a really smart guy
And I understand he was critical to passing the new limits on Campaign Finance. However, I believe that bill was Wilson Goode Jr's.
Thanks Hannah for this excellent analysis of Nutter's campaign
Thanks Hannah for this excellent analysis! Am looking forward to reading part 2.
Supporting Michael Nutter for Mayor
Let's rename this blog the Mike Nutter love page
Hannah, I like and respect you, but this is really over the top. Nutter doesn't wear a cape. He does have a variety of fine personal qualities, and is pretty honest. But here are a few other facts:
-- By his own admission, Nutter was a loyal supporter of everything Mayor Street did and wanted while he was in City Council. That accounts for half of the time Nutter was in Council.
-- Nutter supported wasting $30 million a year on building two new sports stadia while other City capital needs went unmet. He was on the opposite side of that issue from Councilmen Cohen and Ortiz, as well as Brett Mandel.
-- He relentlessly fought on behalf of a developer's building plans on Venice Island, despite a large grass roots opposition movement by Manyunk residents concerned about how the development would exacerbate flooding in the area. He was also fiercely opposed on this issue by Councilman Cohen. (For details on that issue, see the article written on the subject by the president of the Friends of Manayunk Canal, Darlene Messina, at http://www.manayunkcanal.org/oldsite/news/inq021003.htm
-- And, of course, he has been zealous leader of the cut taxes at any cost movement in City Council.
So Hannah, I would just suggest, that in addition to looking at the personal qualities that you admire in a candidate, that you also look at his/her record and views. It's all well and good for a candidate to have excellent leadership skills and be personable, but we also need to look at where the individual would lead us. And on that count, in my view, Nutter falls short.
Considering Gaetano was just Censored...
and had an anti-Fattah post removed from the front-page, I don't think this blog should be renamed anything but "Censors for Fattah."
______________________________
Phillyville
Except my post lauding Fattah
for having a program for women wasn't on the front page for even a minute.
Oh stalker, always ready
Oh stalker, always ready with some positive feedback.
I should preface this
I should preface this comment by saying I don't support any candidate for Mayor. (This is not an attempt to spin.) I agree that Nutter was for a short period considered one of then Council President Street's biggest supporters. (For support, I would recommend researching Nutter's attacks on Lynn Abraham as D.A. early in his career.) I am not sure what started the split b/w the two, but the Inquirer's archives I am sure will give some insight.
But I don't know that the record will reflect that Nutter was an adamant supporter of new stadia. I think you will find, and Stan would know better than anyone, he was fairly ambivalent about the need for new stadia. What I believe he advocated initially was redoing the Vet.
I like Nutter's thoughtfulness about the City, but the only item I really never have understood is his position on Comcast. I seem to recall he was a more aggressive supporter than any in the City on every issue. (WPVI/Comcast fight is a good example.) (Also, there are those who remember that Nutter was a supporter of Campbell's.)
Nutter
I just dont buy it.
There is something about him that just doesnt say "mayor". "Mayor Nutter of Philadelphia."
I think not.
I hate to be superficial, but he just doesnt have the 'look'. I dont know, maybe thats just me...