Save The Broad Street Buildings

Yesterday, the State Department of General Services (DGS), which is building the Convention Center Expansion, ignored a ruling by the State Historical Commission, and started demolishing two historic buildings that stand in the path of the new building.

This is doubly disappointing. It is important that we save these buildings. And the way in which the DGS, and our political leaders, are acting is truly despicable. Evidently it was too expensive to violate the trust of the people the way we usually do them in this state--which would have meant that the demolition would have started at 2 am. Instead, the state has acted at the next most nefarious time, when the holiday season is upon us and we were celebrating, among other things, a decision that we thought would protect these buildings.

The whole story is below. Read it. And then email Governor Rendell and ask him to order the DGS to stop destroying our heritage.

The Effort to Save the Broad Street Buildings

For years, a determined group of preservationists, some of them my friends and / or people I’ve worked with before, like the incredible John Gallery of the Preservation Alliance and Alan Greenberger of the Design Advocacy Group, have been working to save two historic buildings on Broad Street, the Philadelphia Life Insurance Building and its Annex, that were in the path of the expanded Convention Center. The Annex, a building by the great Philadelphia architect, Aldo Giurgola, was path-breaking in that it showed that a modern building could, and often should, take into account the context in which it is built rather than standing apart as an abstract monument.

In 2004, the Convention Center signed an agreement with the State Historical Commission to preserve the facades of these building and incorporate them into the Convention Center.

Saving the facades of these buildings was not just a genuflection to the past. Incorporating them into the Convention Center expansion would have improved it by breaking up what will otherwise be a big, bland and boring exterior on Broad Street.

The Effort to Weasel out of the Agreement

The State Department of General Services, which is building the expansion, has been trying to weasel out of the agreement in the last year, saying that the facades could not be saved. But, according to Inga Saffron’s report in the Inky, the Convention Center’s own architects denied this claim.

On Friday I celebrated when I read that the campaign lead by the Preservation Alliance and the Design Advocacy Group to pressure the State Historical Commission to save the buildings had been successful as the Commission ruled on Thursday that the facades should be saved.

But, someone concluded that this was only an “advisory opinion” and, decided to put facts on he ground when no one would be looking. So, yesterday, demolition began. No one knows who ordered the demolition but someone from the Governor’s office is quoted, without attribution, saying that “we have no intention of leaving those buildings.”

Politics as Usual

I hope I am wrong, but as far as I know, not one political official in this city has spoken out about saving these buildings, or took any action to enforce the State Historical Commission ruling yesterday.

So this is just one more example of how politics in this city and state is not just broken but absolutely disgusting. It is a shameful act that diminishes our city and our spirit.

It is Not Over

But there is still a chance, to change directions. So far, only the limestone pieces on the Giugola building have been removed. The buildings are still standing. The Preservation Alliance will be seeking an emergency injunction today or tomorrow. I will post again if and when a hearing is held, with the hope that many of you will come out to lend your support.

In the meantime, Governor Rendell can stop the destruction of these buildings. Please email Governor Rendelland ask him to act now.

don't save the buildings....

... save historic preservation, period. As Inga's article says:

The demolition, which began at 6:30 a.m. and by midday had produced a waist-high pile of broken limestone, sent shock waves through Philadelphia's preservation community, which was still celebrating Thursday's action by the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission. They believed that the commission's two-page ruling amounted to a legal reprieve and would stop the Convention Center's bulldozers from reaching Broad Street.

But an official close to Gov. Rendell insisted that the commission's ruling was "only an opinion" and not binding on the center.

"We have no intention of leaving those buildings," added the official, who asked not to be identified.

"I don't get it," said Alan Greenberger, chairman of the Design Advocacy Group, which campaigned with Philadelphia's Preservation Alliance to save the historic structures, between Arch and Cherry Streets. "We, as architects, have never been able to say, 'That's just PHMC's opinion, and we'll ignore it.' "

....

Greenberger warned that the demoliton could seriously erode the credibility of the state historical commission and other agencies.

"Why should anybody now trust a deal made with a public agency on historic preservation?" he asked. "They don't honor deals. That's the message of all this."

Not to get too over dramatic, but, if rulings that buildings are certified historic and shouldn't be knocked down are just ignored, we are really opening up the possibility that historic preservation rulings will simply be ignored.

take two minutes and email the Gov.

I emailed this:

Dear Governor Rendell,

I am writing to express my concern that the State has ignored rulings from the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission in order to clear way for the expansion of the convention center. Doing so not only seems to be in violation of the law and agreement that was signed by all parties, but calls into question the legitimacy of any future agreements and rulings on historic preservation.

Please stop this destruction, and save historic preservation in the State.

Great Response So far

To judge by the out of office responses I got to my email blast, half of the 33,000 people on my email list are out of town.

Yet despite that, hundreds of emails have already been sent to the Governor about the historic buildings threatened by the Convention Center expansion.

Thanks to Dan for pointing to the larger issues involved in this dispute and for writing a great email. Now if more of you would just copy it and send it on to the Governor, we might have a shot of stopping further destruction of, not just some lovely buildings but the process by which any good building is saved from irresponsibile development.

Paging Michael Nutter

Very depressing, and infuriating

Now I have even more of a reason to feel that the Convention Center expansion is emblematic of so many of the things wrong with Phlly.

It would be great if Michal Nutter would weigh in on this issue: if he voiced opposition, it would go a long way towards proving that he not willing to sell our city to the moneyed interests that are behind this project.

Request for an Injunction Filed

by the Preservation Alliance. I do not know when the hearing will be but will post it as soon as I find out.

I haven't been to the site so I don't know if demolition is continuing. (I wrenched my back on Saturday and am not that mobile right now.) If anyone lives nearby and can take a look, please do so and report back.

Marc

Convention Center expansion: Court stops two building demolition

http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/20071224_Convention_Center_e...

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, in a ruling for emergency relief, today ordered the two state agencies overseeing the Pennsylvania Convention Center's expansion to immediately halt demolition of two Center City buildings that are at the center of a protracted legal fight with Philadelphia's Preservation Alliance.

This, I loved:

Further, the agency said in a letter last week to the state historical commission, incorporating the two buildings into the design for the Convention Center expansion would be too costly.

What's the budget for this project - something like 700 million?

Hearing January 8 / About the Cost

A hearing on the request for an injunction will be held on Tuesday, January 8, at 10:00 am in Courtroom Number One, Fifth Floor, Irvis Office Building in Harrisburg.

As I get more information about the hearing and, especially, about whether it would be helpful for supporters to attend the hearing, I’ll report back here.

Thanks to all of you who contacted the Governor or otherwise showed your support for these buildings and historic preservation process in Pennsylvania.

I laughed when I saw that the DGS is concerned about the extra costs of saving the two buildings. Obviously cost was not a consideration when they paid time and a half to have people come in on a Saturday to start demolition.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content