- Council Committee Passed the Freeze
- Carol Campbell Passes Away
- My first trip to the public library
- Fight digital exclusion
- What if half of Philadelphia didn't have roads?
- You know, let's not even worry about the City Commissioners office messing up voter registration processing
- Bold ideas to fix the budget
- Mayor Nutter's Town Hall Meeting Schedule
- City Releases Library Information to City Council
- Size of Philadelphia government?
SEPTA and kids: "Not our issue"
Parents United for Public Education has been working for months to stop a District proposal to cut thousands of students off from free transpasses as part of a deficit-reduction plan.
Last fall, Gov. Rendell, Sen. Vince Fumo and SEPTA officials held a big press conference announcing that, for the first time, students in Philadelphia would get what students across the state already receive – free transportation for grades 7-12. For all students living more than 1.5 miles from school, the state and SEPTA would fund free transpasses. This applied to all parochial and charter students as well as public.
Unfortunately, after the media headlines the cost issue was a lot different. Because of the expansion of passes, the District’s transportation costs tripled to over $30 million. But the state refused to reimburse about $7 million in the District’s transportation costs, partly because they are reneging on the 1.5 mile requirement. State minimums are supposed to be two miles or more. So now the District is weighing how to save about $4.2 million by either instituting an 85% attendance requirement on transpasses (an issue that would impact only Philadelphia public school students, not parochial or charter) or extending the mileage requirement from 1.5 miles to 2 miles. Either way thousands of students lose.
The good news is that parents have gotten the attention of city and some state officials, but apparently not SEPTA. From today’s Inky :
Not so fast, said SEPTA general manager Joseph Casey. The agency already gives the district a discount for TransPasses, and it has agreed to pay the district $3.5 million for administering the program, per a deal cut with the state last year.
"If they have an issue with the amount of money or the distance, it's really between them and the Department of Education," Casey said. "They can go anywhere they want to, to try to get the money, but it's not our issue."
City Advocate Lance Haver pointed out to me that 80% of SEPTA’s local match is funded by city taxpayer dollars, and that SEPTA is sitting on a $130 million rainy day fund.
One of the things we need to build is a sense of communal responsibility for the schools. Let's be clear: the School District of Philadelphia pays for a variety of costs that have nothing to do with traditional public school students - like transporting parochial, charter and private school students to school, say, or maintaining pools for private swim club use, or providing non-District after school and summer program space. They do it because there's a sense that schools ideally need to function as a community anchor in neighborhoods that often lack one. But in return we need to own our public schools, whether we have children in them or not.
Transportation is an issue of basic access to education, and for that reason, it’s not just a school issue, or a Dept. of Ed issue. It’s a city issue because truants are a city issue, because drop-outs are a city issue, and because crime and violence by and against children is a city issue.
If you have time, join some of us today at the SEPTA board meeting to remind SEPTA that in some cases, our issues are intertwined.
SEPTA BOARD MEETING
Today, June 26th
3 p.m. sharp
1234 Market Street











It's the schools stupid
Education is the number one issue facing this city yet this board seems to relegate it to second tier status. Why is our crime rate so high? Because our drop out rate is so high. Why is our drop out rate so high? Because our early learning literacy involvement is so low. What is the number one factor in determining property values? Property values and thus real estate taxes are dependent on the quality of schools in the neighborhood. Why is this city having such hard time attracting families? It's the schools stupid.
Another obnoxious comment from SEPTA
Saturday’s Inky reports more obnoxious comments by SEPTA regarding its responsibilities to the schools:
I wasn’t aware of things that things like taking care of your employees or helping contribute to a successful effort to improve student attendance were akin to “wasting money.”
Furthermore, SEPTA sits on a $130 million Rainy Day fund that it is strangely becoming more and more evasive about reporting:
Proper reporting of funds is essential to ensure appropriate management. It's not up to SEPTA to determine which funds to report or not to report simply to avoid public input. SEPTA should be commended for having built up a surplus, but as a quasi-public agency that receives millions in taxpayer money, they are accountable to public scrutiny.