Tired of red-baiting, anti-gay, anti-choice conservatives ruining our state? Vote Today!

Joan Orie Melvin wants to be a State Supreme Court Justice. So much so she got the PA Republican Party to run this ad to drive the rabid right "Tea Party" types to the polls tomorrow.

Remember this is an ad for a judicial election, where the candidate is supposed to decide court decisions impartially, based on careful consideration of the state constitution and case law.

But it should not be surprising from Joan Orie Melvin. Her sister, Jane Orie, is the State Senator who rallied the Republican troops for a constitutional ban on gay marriage. Senator Orie opposes abortion unconditionally and vocally opposes extending state protections against job and housing discrimination to gays and lesbians. According to Project Vote Smart, Orie would also like to "limit the welfare benefits given to recipients if they have additional children."

So every child's life is sacred until they are born, but after that let 'em suffer so their parents can be punished for bringing them into the world, apparently.


Sen. Orie also was major force behind the Senate Republican budget antics this summer, including the pension provisions that almost sent the city into Plan C.

But how close are these two sisters's politics, really? Close enough that Orie Melvin recieved $25,000 from State Senate Republican Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi. Which is an interestingly partisan investment for a candidate who has made a ton of noise about her Democratic opponent, Jack Panella, receiving contributions from trial lawyers (while taking more than $100k from the same trial lawyers herself).

Call your friends and neighbors, remind them there is one very close election that really matters this fall. And please remember to vote.

Marc Stier explaining the importance of redistricting

In more eloquent words than I could.

And in the Supreme Court race, the critical matter is legislative redistricting. It is likely that a the two houses of the General Assembly will be split once again after the 2010 election, with Republicans controlling the Senate and Democrats the House. The Supreme Court will thus make the crucial decision in whether to side with a Democratic or Republican plan for redistricting Congressional and State Legislative districts.

I strongly support a non-partisan system of drawing district lines. But so long as we are stuck with the current system, I want Democrats to control the redistricting, not Republicans.

After the 2000 census, the Republicans redrew the lines for these districts in ways that very much enhanced the ability of Republicans to elect members of Congress, the State Senate and the State House. Indeed, the Republican stranglehold on the Senate—which is the biggest barrier to progressive public policy in the state—will never be broken if we don’t redraw State Senate districts lines in a more balanced and fair manner.

-Sean
MrLuigi, my cat, actually only types half as badly as I do.

Taking a break from canvassing

to remind everyone in the YPP community to get out and do your democratic duty.

Vote today or refrain from complaining about redistricting, judges, the DA's office, or City finances for the next four years.

Supporting Seth, Jack Panella, and the Democrats live from the 2nd Ward.

Sam from Philly For Change

Does having voted give us the right to bemoan this choice?

because it is pretty worrisome.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content