- So, Let's Talk Hypothetically About Budget Cuts
- Nutter Town Halls Back on Tonight
- Brian Hickey Seriously Injured
- Filmmaker sought to Document and Follow the Timeline of Political, Zoning and Environmental Crimes in Philly
- FDR, Obama, and the Path to Health Care Reform in 2009
- How We Vote
- It's Our City Interview with Mike Nutter
- Witnesses to Hunger
- Reardon's Actual Library Closing Criteria
- Books for everyone: Buy, buy, buy, buy, buy
Tommy the Loan Shark & Jim Nixon: GOOD JOB MIKE!!!!
Hello!
This is Tommy the Loan Shark & Jim Nixon. Tommy and I were very busy with final exams, so we had to basically put the breaks on things… We never endorsed a candidate (for what that is worth… haha), as it seemed very close to us right through the end.
For the record, we were never part of any campaign. We stand by that 100%.
And again, Mr. Keel’s obnoxious intrusion into our press conference was not why things slowed a bit. We really were very busy.
TO THE GOOD NEWS!!!!
We achieved our goal in keeping Knox out of City Hall (not that we take a large share of credit for that, we were just doing our part). As we have said all along, that was our one and ONLY goal. We congratulate Mr. Nutter, and feel he will make an excellent mayor. Good for you Mike!
If anybody needs to contact us, please e-mail us at: tommytheloanshark@yahoo.com
Mr. Nutter, if you need campaign assistance I’d be happy to help out. My friend who played Tommy is taking a summer abroad (and yes, I am jealous). –Jim
Thanks, it was a great time!
Tommy the Loan Shark and his sidekick Jim Nixon











Also...
We are especially happy that in Knox failing, we will not see Janie Blackwell, John Dougherty, Frank Keel, or Mr. Youngblood get any grip on City Hall! I guess loosing is what he gets for associating with the bottom of the barrel...
We are also thrilled that all that money could not buy City Hall!!!! I cannot imagine spending over $10,000,000.00 and countless hours for nothing...
And Lastly, We Promise...
Congratulations to Mr. Fattah, Mr. Brady, and Mr. Evans! You all ran very solid issue-based campaigns. Compared to the norm, it was very enjoyable and classy!
Jimmy and Tommy, I exposed
Jimmy and Tommy,
I exposed your connection to Smukler and the Brady campaign on that fateful Friday at City Hall. Although you vowed to return the following week to continue your juvenile and useless harassment of Tom Knox, you vanished, just like the gutless dopes I knew you to be. Go away for good. And thanks for the memory. I will always savor the taste of grilled shark.
Frank, I wouldn't be all that boastful if I was you
Remember when you and 98 dropped the ball on the Knox campaign? I thought you guys "always win".
Someone
should just get over themself.
www.jameskenney.com
www.311forphilly.com
Councilman Kenney,
You truly are a petty, insecure political hack. You owe your entire career to upstanding folks like Bob Brady and Vince Fumo. You likely make more money with your ethically-questionable "consulting" jobs and board memberships than you do as a Councilman. You loathe and fear John Dougherty because he truly knows you, the real Jim Kenney - the unstable sycophant who works for your own personal enrichment, not for the benefit of the citizens who unwittingly elect you. I have little doubt that as a result of this blog post, you will likely renew your quest to kill the couple of city contracts I've earned. That's fine. Do your worst. I'll still wake up tomorrow with my integrity intact. You'll still wake up as Jim Kenney. I wear your hatred of me as a badge of honor, you phony.
Keep your voice down Frank, Ashcroft is listening!
Jim- when a true hack/PR "expert" (read shit-spinner extraordinaire) who has zero integrity and is a complete stranger to any sane notion of "truth" starts coming after you because of a lack of "integrity", you know you're doing something right.
Just an fyi: people fear Johnny Doc because he has the reputation of a mobster (please don't send me any dead fish for saying that). People loath him because he has zero morals, is a republican in Dem clothes, and uses his political positions to bully people.
Geez Alex,
I'm sorry your old man lost on Tuesday, but don't misdirect your hissy fit at me. I don't know you and you sure as hell don't know a thing about me. I'm sure Councilman Kenney appreciates you sticking up for him. He would do it himself, except he's always walking around with his head down, trying to avoid eye contact. Makes it hard to see. Shall we call a truce to the name-calling that, once again, was initiated by Kenney? As for one of Kenney's "axis of evil" members, John Dougherty, he and Bill Keller stood shoulder to shoulder with Governor Rendell this morning - at the Governor's request - to announce the successful negotiations that will bring dredging to the Delaware, move the Food Distribution Center out of the way, and create thousands of jobs and billions in revenue for the region. Rendell, Dougherty and Keller kept it alive and made it happen. Kenney? He doesn't even talk to Dougherty and Keller, let alone do anything to help. Kenney normally attends these kinds of things, but couldn't bear the site of Keller getting praise from Rendell and a standing ovation from the grateful residents of South Philly. That's what Doc and Keller were doing today while Jimmy was spewing vitriol on the blogs.
Frank, what exactly are you
Frank, what exactly are you trying to accomplish by posting on the blog? You are not going to win any friends through name calling. I liked it much better when Jeff Marshall speaks for Local 98-- he seems to drink slightly less coffee than you.
---
Check out my blog!
I don't want to be your
I don't want to be your friend, Ben, and I don't drink coffee. I just have very little tolerance for bullshit, con artists and grown men in shark costumes.
I don't drink coffee either.
I find it to be quite bitter. In my family, however, not drinking coffee is like not being Catholic.
Anyway, to the point--we do not have to be friends to be civil.
I don't know a thing about you?
I may not know you personally, but you maintain a pretty high profile...
Kool-Aid
Overdose. Call rescue.
www.jameskenney.com
www.311forphilly.com
I know Dmac already mentioned it
But Jim Kenney's title-to-comment timing is among the best in the blogosphere.
Yo Jimbo,
Don't you have any Council work to do? Or did you get elected as At-Large Blogger? You're an embarrassment to city government.
Yojimbo
What a great Kurosawa movie. Oh...wait, what?
Frank, I'm curious as to why you think Mr. Kenney received by FAR the most votes out of any at large candidate (and I didn't even vote for him!). If he is, as you say, "an embarassment to city government," you obviously failed at getting that message out. Perhaps you were too busy doing more important things, like picking a fight with a man in a shark costume.
I won't even mention the inherent ridiculousness of ragging on someone's internet tendencies in your own blog comment. Give it a rest. The election is over.
***
Volunteering for Michael Nutter
Pot Calling Kettle
Mr. Keel,
You calling Jim Kenney a political hack while in the same breath praising Bill Keller is ironic at best. I hope Doc and Keller enjoy their own company, they're going to need each other.
Hey Alex,
it's clear from this post that you don't know anything about John Dougherty, his morality or what he does for people from all walks of life. As far as your accusation that he's a "Republican in Dem clothes," perhaps your anger stems from the fact that Larry Ceisler and John supported Donna Reed-Miller over your father. Donna won, by the way. And you might want to ask Sister Mary Scullion, the disabled kids of the Variety Club, the American Red Cross, the victims of Hurricane Katrina or anyone associated with the dozens of charities John has helped, if he's a bully. He is more effective and has done more good for more people than 90% of the elected officials I know. Like I said, you don't know John. I think you owe him an apology for your slanderous statements. If you'd like to call John and actually get to know him, call him at 215-563-5592.
A fairweather dem...
You know what I call someone who supports one of the worst Republican extremists in the country? A republican. Doc may have thought that Santorum would send 98 some work, but he was an enemy of labor if ever there was one, let alone to progressive/dem causes in general. And this wasn't Doc's first time supporting Republicans over Dems, if I recall correctly he also supported Specter as well.
I have no doubt that John has a good side- nobody with his clout gets to where they are by bullying alone- but so what? Does that excuse his other, less than morale, behaviors?
I also have no problem getting to know Doc, hell maybe he's a great guy to throw back a few with. I'd also venture to guess that we'd share similar goals 90% of the time (for example I am firmly on the side of expanding the port rather than placing a food center on the waterfront or placing a casino where it would threaten trade activity), but that does not mean that I support his or 98s tactics.
Aww Alex... Santorum again???
Hi Alex. Nice to come back from a day off and find you sandbagging Doc and Local 98 with mobster references and then hiding behind Jason Fagone’s opinions and the Santorum argument. Keep serving up the fresh material, Kapote.
I know the readers at YPP have a problem with the whole Doc and Santorum thing. I can honestly say I respect and understand why too. However, in a forum that exists to discuss differences of opinion it keeps coming up as a reason to justify bashing Local 98 and I think that’s wrong.
I’ve talked about it before and tried to explain our position. Ben Waxman did a post on it too. But once and for all, here is the final and official (and condensed) story of Johnny Doc and Rick Santorum.
First of all, let’s do away with the Republican in Democrats clothing statement. John has been involved with Democrats since Harris Wofford in the 80’s. He still has the photo of Thornburgh crossing a picket line which was key to Wofford getting elected. His involvement there led him to support Bill Clinton, which in turn led him to support Ron Klink when he narrowly missed beating Santorum. Ron Klink is still a dear friend of Johns. Maybe you didn’t know that. Now you do.
So, fast forward to 2006 when we got behind him. What changed? The economy. In case there is any confusion about what we do here at IBEW Local 98 – WE REPRESENT OUR MEMBERS AND PUT THEM TO WORK. Period. Before anything else. Before left or right wing political concerns. Before blogging. It’s the single most important thing to us.
In order to accomplish this goal, we use politics as a tool. At the time we supported Santorum, he was bringing the IRS building here, helping put a massive check processing facility in town and also supported us on the dredging issue. The way I see it is that if someone is helping keep over 250 of your working families employed for over 2 years, you want to keep them around.
And yes, I’m a Pro-Choice, Clinton loving donkey kissing Democrat and I voted for Santorum. I voted for him because it was in the best interest of keeping the members of my union employed. I’m totally comfortable with it. In fact, the only reason I think about it is when someone brings it up on the blogs as a reason to be against Doc or Local 98.
So, I’m hoping that we can all move on from the leftover meatloaf that the Santorum argument has become. I’ll even suggest a new topic – should members of City Council be allowed to moonlight as consultants? Comments? Councilman Kenney?
In a Nutshell
If you want to know the problem most progressives have with Local 98, it's this:
Whether or not Santorum was a good friend to labor in general and the electricians' union in particular, is a separate argument already raised by RS's AFL-CIO rating.
But the rest of us, we're not electricians. We're just people who use birth control, who are gay, who've been faced with the terrible position of choosing to have an abortion, whose working families fight and die in Iraq -- well over 300 of them -- or who stand so far on the opposite side of any of another thousand extreme positions Santorum took at the top of his lungs.
So when you say that none of those things matter to you, that a fistful of jobs are worth more to you than any of that -- then, yeah, a lot of us begin to think, if we haven't already, that no matter how genial they seem to be or how much good work they've done, those guys at Local 98 are bad for progressives, bad for Philadelphia, bad for Pennsylvania, and bad for our country.
Short Sighted
I did not say none of those things matter to me. I said, as a labor union, our priorities are set accordingly.
Bad for our country? FDR once said "It is one of the characteristics of a free and democratic nation that it have free and independent labor unions." I guess he didn't know anything about what's good for our county either, right?
The Distinction
Hey, I'm glad we have free and independent labor unions. But like you said yourself, sometimes your interests and ours just aren't the same. And certainly the political choices aren't.
An honest question
If maybe too abstract for you to answer.
At what point do you think it becomes necessary, if at all, for a union to balance what's good for its members against the needs of the larger community?
Can you always rationalize that what's good for the union is, by definition, what's best for the community? Do you believe that such an attitude can play into the hands of those promoting anti-union sentiment?
My anger...
I had no idea who Doc and Larry were supporting, but I'm sure if either of them sent my dad a check he'd likely send it right back. Given Larry and Donna's attempts to plant a Casino in the middle of the 8th District, it doesn't surprise me a bit that he'd support her. I also believe that Larry represented the scumbag lenders that my dad constantly goes after, as well as some other unsavory characters (I could be wrong, but that is my recollection) so I don't know why he'd support someone who actually looks out for the interests of the district (espescially the poor).
Oh My God,
the Nobel Committee is very interested.
www.jameskenney.com
www.311forphilly.com
I don't always agree with
I don't always agree with John (see Tom Knox as exhibit A), but I think calling him a mobster is pretty unfair. People always throw around those kinds of accusations without any basis of proof. Is he aggressive? Yes. Does he fight hard for his members? Absolutely. Does he get in people’s faces? You bet. Does that make him a crook? No way. It's fine to disagree with folks at Local 98, but please don't fall for the right-wing smear of labor leaders. Calling union officials corrupt without any proof is one of the oldest tricks in the book.
---
Check out my blog!
Doc's rep
Ben, the only tricks being played are the ones your mind is playing on you. I never said Doc was a mobster, I said that's his rep. Are you arguing that this isn't his rep? He seems to savor/cultivate his thug image, so I don't know what exactly you are arguing.
As far as your goofy insinuations that I am trying to paint any sort of picture of unions as corrupt in general, get real. I aint falling for no smears, and I aint falling for your false dichotomies either. Next time I guess I'll ask your permission before criticizing someone associated with a union. I wouldn't want to fall for any right wing smears!
Moving Forward.
Dan,
John Dougherty is not a mobster. Dan, I agree with most of your politics but that is really nothing more than an ad hominem attack on a man that has done a lot of good for his community in Pennsport and throughout the city. Remember, as the business manager of a union, Doc's first responsibility is to make sure his membership is not sitting on the bench and every decision professionally and politically reflects that primary interest: protecting pension funds, living wages, health care and safe job sites. These are the same issues all of us should be fighting for in our own jobs and for all workers in this country.
I worked against Tom Knox and Local 98 on Tuesday as Field Director for The Economic Justice Coalition for Truth. I wasn't affiliated with Brady, as you know I was Chaka's Policy Director during the Exploratory Committee. I did it to stop Knox and to help out my close friend Ken Smukler (with whom I've worked for many years) who has taken a lot of shit in this race but should also be given much of the credit for making sure Tom Knox will not be the next Mayor of Philadelphia.
While it got a little hot at times on E-Day, never once did I feel truly threatened by anyone at Local 98 representing the Knox campaign. One of my closest friends is a business agent at Local 98 and all of the men I know from the organization are some of the kindest most generous people I have ever met in this town.
Elections are bloodsport and they are so for self-interest. With that said, this election is over. This city needs a lot of work and no single person can do it alone. It will take all stakeholders including government actors, unions and other institutions, the non-profit sector, and commercial interests along with all the giants in this town to come together in varying degrees, stop the name calling, and realize that a high tide raises all the ships in the harbor.
We need to get over Fumo/Brady V. Doc, Progressives V. Party/Doc, Black V. White, Black V. Black, Rich V. Poor, Keel V. Smukler and every other masturbatory, self-perpetuating and ever-expanding conflict that keeps holding this city back: No more crabs in a pot because we don't have the luxury.
In 2010 we will take part in the new census and stand for judgement. Wouldn't it be astounding if for the first time in decades we grew our population, employment, home ownership, income and education levels? Alas, it won't happen unless the above mentioned is to happen first.
I guess that's all I have to share right now. I wish we could all declare a truce for the next few weeks, catch our breath and stop the sniping. We have a new Mayor. Let us take some time to think how we can all best work together as a fist in the interest of this city and our citizens.
Have a good night,
Harry
My name is Alex...
And, again, I did not call Doc a mobster.
I appreciate some of what you are saying, espescially your calls to move past the petty back and forths between the different factions that have kept the city from making meaningful changes that we so desperately need, but that's going to take some action on the part of the Doc loyalists as well. If you note, Kenney said one small thing, only to get attacked by Doc's pr guy.
I couldn't disagree more with the short sighted notion that whomevever gets enough work for 98 should be whom they support. Santorum was horrendous for unions, working families, health care, etc. and the fact that Doc/98 supported him shows a good amount of short sightedness, and a huge lack of support for Dem causes in general. I don't care how many electricians Santorum put to work, he had a ZERO rating from the AFL-CIO, and there was almost no bigger enemy to the American worker than man-on-dog:
http://www.ontheissues.org/Domestic/Rick_Santorum_Jobs.htm
sorry alex ... i meant you rather than your brother
sorry.
Doc and Keller
While I am not sure that I understand Mr. Engler's comment about Doc and Keller enjoying their own company, I would like to thank State Representative William Keller and Pennsport Civic Association President, John Dougherty, for all they do for our community. I know many people - who are actively involved in our community - appreciate the hard work and generosity of both men. The pettiness and jealousy is ridiculous. Thank you John and Bill and please know that the community continues to support you. Henry
Not Pettty
Henry,
Really nothing petty about it to be honest, just a matter of disagreement. For instance, Mr. Keel decided to take it upon himself to come on here and degrade Councilman Kenney, and to praise Rep. Keller and Dougherty for standing together for dredging and other port related issues. I was just stating that they are now going to need each other more than ever, considering the hostile reaction that Dougherty might face from the new mayoral administration come January.
Now, I'm sure you might consider me to be jealous and petty, considering you've yelled at me before for making a comment if you so remember, but thats not the intention. I understand your vehement protection of the ports, and recognize your consistent fight against casinos but not in relation to your love for Rep. Keller. Afterall, Keller did vote for the bill that has given us this problem, and please don't make the Fumo argument because we're in total agreement that the Senator played a key part as well. But why is Keller given a free pass while others are thrown under the bus?
Good point.
Every member of the Philadelphia delegation to the State General Assembly signed onto casinos. Surely, some are running around trying to cover their tracks or otherwise play catch-up to true and strong community opposition. It will not work, however. In 2004 the dye was cast.
Sorry, I didn't mean to hijack your comment. I just am very touchy about this issue.
Does Love have some secret meaning on this site?
Your quote was "I hope they enjoy their company." A petty comment if there ever was one. Almost as petty as the mocking comment you made several months ago that elicited a response from me. You are free to speak your mind, and I'll speak mine. I could not let yours be the only comment from our community. Bill Keller recently helped our community group with a $5,000.00 grant. Did you know that? Did you know we were approximately $5,000.00 under our budget? Thank you Bill Keller.
Again, Not Petty
It's fine if you believe my comment(s) to be petty, its your perogative, and my opinion is not the lone one from "our" neighborhood, as quite a few people that I know of have posted on this website before, including quite a few from Local 98 that have called me out for having ties to a friend of mine who works for Councilman Kenney. As far as your Whitman budget goes, I was unaware of that certain $5,000 shortfall, or the recent grant. Congratulations!
But again, my question is, why do many in our community, including seemingly yourself, continue to give Rep. Keller a pass for voting for the casino bill, while others are thrown under the bus? It doesn't make sense to me the anger directed at certain Councilpersons, while the state delegations (excluding Fumo) are given a pass about this issue.
Jealousy?
I'm always curious when people ascribe any criticism of Johnny Doc's political involvement as "jealousy," or deflect it by pointing toward 98's charitable work. There is absolutely no doubt that Local 98 has been a sponsor or participant in any number of good causes; Doc and his associates are to be commended for this, absolutely. And 98, despite its lack of success in some high-profile campaigns (Santorum, Knox), will remain a force on the political scene for years to come.
You have to wonder, though, which Johnny Doc and 98 are so widely regarded as a cancer on the body politic. When asked which of the mayoral candidates they viewed most negatively last, July, 55 percent chose Dougherty. That's amazing. I'm not saying that's a fair perception, but that's how it is. I think the reasons for this are pretty obvious; Doc and Keel are associated with a particularly virulent brand of electoral politics, which spends way more time spinning and trashing other candidates than promoting its own. (See, for instance, Keel's promise to put out an anti-Nutter screed every day between the last debate and the election.) There's a perception that where elections are concerned, Doc doesn't really believe in anything other than his own power, which explains his iffy candidate selections over the last 4 years.
So, while it's great that 98 guys and Doc supporters come on here and promote their interests, I have to wonder whether they wouldn't be better served by changing their tactics and playing a little nicer in the sandbox.
***
Volunteering for Michael Nutter
Jealousy, What I meant!
Earlier in this thread someone posted a statement about "Doc and Keller" and, I think, implied that they are all alone. Here is the comment, "I hope Doc and Keller enjoy their own company, they're going to need each other." I cannot comment on the writer's hopes or Doc and Keller's needs, but I can comment on the fact that they are not alone. Further, I wanted to make it clear that there are peolple who appreciate their good work. I understand reasonable people may have different opinions. To me, there is no explanation other than petty politics or jealousy for some of the things written here. Henry
Henry, just because people
Henry, just because people do not share your love for Local 98 does not mean they are petty or jealous, per se. Similarly, airing grievences or support for what is obviously factional infighting does not necessarily place you in this category either. If that were the standard we went by, your coming on here to only defend (and having never made a substantive contribution) would qualify you as the same.
Now, I think what you have overlooked is, the side you are defending are likewise engaged in petty politics--just see the above.
Clearly, Local 98 does do some very good things. But, Doc's problem is more one of perception. I have no problem with any of these people personally. I do not know them and cannot comment. Though, through my work on the DRNA, I too am happy with some of their commitment to their communities. It is uplifting.
Their politics, however, are sometimes questionable. Exhibit "A"--supporting Rick Santorum. Exhibit "B"--supporting Knox (and even Blackwell). Progressives, and right minded Democrats will not love you for supporting Santorum. I don't care how it is spun.
Maybe everyone needs to take a breath of fresh air. John Doc is not a "mobster." Local 98 does do lots of charitable work. They support some progressive candidates too, like the $60,000 they gave to Ellen Green -Ciesler about a week ago. But, they are wrong a lot too. Let's not expect perfection and let's realize people have faults.
Now, we have tons of work to do to keep our new mayor and city council on task to make all of Philadelphia a better place. Maybe Frank Keel and Councilman Kenney will never like each other--it really isn't my place to discuss--but they both clearly love Philadelphia. It is what binds us together.
Where did Local 98 come from?
I posted a message about two men; John Dougherty and William Keller. I never mentioned Local 98. Yet, Gaetano, you try to bring Local 98 into the discussion. As for my "love for local 98," I do love my brother. Henry
The Stork, perhaps.
That is what permeates this entire discussion, Henry. You know it, I know it--so does everyone else. I'm not disparaging the group. I'm just not being shy about the issue everyone is kinda-sorta-talking about. It is what, in part, gives those two men (without passing any judgment) their clout.
I'm glad you do "love [your] brother." I have a love too, Henry--it's called Philadelphia. I'm thinking, if we all acted like we loved our city a bit more, the petty jealousies would disappear.
Since all the special interests are standing up
for their interests, I should stand up for mine: I'll be very depressed (and short of material) if threads like this disappear from YPP.