- Nutter Town Halls Back on Tonight
- Brian Hickey Seriously Injured
- Filmmaker sought to Document and Follow the Timeline of Political, Zoning and Environmental Crimes in Philly
- FDR, Obama, and the Path to Health Care Reform in 2009
- How We Vote
- It's Our City Interview with Mike Nutter
- Witnesses to Hunger
- Reardon's Actual Library Closing Criteria
- Books for everyone: Buy, buy, buy, buy, buy
- Giving Thanks
Who Won the first debate: Objectively
Submitted by Keith Newman on Sat, 09/27/2008 - 4:33pm.
Obama won because he appeared more presidential. McCain seemed childish, always needing to have the last word. Obama was graciously willing to move on to the next question.
McCain seemed angry, scolding Obama, stating Obama was naive or didn't understand even when Obama agreed with McCain. This made McCain look foolish.
Obama was able to see the big picture linking China to Iran, a concept which befuddled McCain making it appear McCain is a small thinker.
Obama by all accounts I have seen won this debate based on his maturity, intelligence, and wisdom.











Quantifying Obama's Win
The terrific polling site FiveThirtyEight.com has a characteristically terrific post on the debate. Especially worthy of note:
A 56-point gap among undecideds on "understanding your needs and problems." Pundits second-guess Obama's "coolness," but his emphasis on the middle-class and their economic insecurity -- rather than, say, the corrupting power of earmarks on members of the U.S. Senate -- connected with voters not necessarily predisposed to identify with Obama.
Another reassuring finding: FiveThirtyEight's models predict that Obama has "a 78.5 percent chance of winning the election"; and "We are now close enough to the election where every day that goes by without McCain making gains in the polls makes him marginally less likely to win. So Obama's win percentage will be ticking up by perhaps half a point a day based on inertia alone."