YPP, Alternative Media and Democracy

Despite the fact that my expertise and leadership skills are needed badly in Washington, and the need for America to rise above partisan politics, I will still be speaking here on Saturday, along with some other familiar faces. After that, I will be rushing back to Fairmount to cast the deciding vote in a game of quizzo:

Are Philadelphia citizens getting the information they need in order to solve community problems, coordinate civic activity, maintain public accountability, and foster the human connectedness that is the backbone of both community and democracy?

The Knight Commission on the Information Needs of Communities in a Democracy (www.knightcomm.org) is conducting a year long study to identify the information needs of communities in a democracy, assess how and whether those needs are being met, and recommend steps to improve the fulfillment of those needs.

In addition to reviewing research on information access and trends, including media developments, new technology, and innovations in civic and government communication, the Commission is soliciting testimony from national experts and holding community forums to hear from local citizens and practitioners about the "information ecosystems" in their communities.

The Commission will issue a report in 2009 offering recommendations for achieving the news and information environment that democratic communities need in order to thrive.

Other participants speaking on the 2PM panel with me include Todd Wolfson and Beth McConnell.

The basic point of our particular panel is to examine how alternative media, including blogs, plays a role in Philadelphia democracy.

So, uh, what should I say?

Impressive panel

Dan, I'm so impressed by that panel (you, Beth, Todd... this is an all-star cast!) that I really think it's your moral OBLIGATION to cancel you participation and demand that all the panelists leave Philadelphia and go to Washington and help the Congress hash out a deal.
Really.
if you guys can't do it, no one can.
Then play Quizzo by the White House.

---
This Too Will Pass, for the guts in your cerebrum.

Quiz

Am I the least qualified person, or only the most unqualified?

9:30-11:30 Roundtable on Unmet Community Information Needs

Peter Bloom, Executive Director, Juntos
Nijmie Dzurinko, Director, Philadelphia Student Union
Don Kimelman, Managing Director, Information Initiatives and the Philadelphia Program, The Pew Charitable Trusts
Janet Ryder, Vice President of Labor Participation, United Way of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Paul Socolar, Editor and Director, The Notebook
Zack Stalberg, President and CEO, The Committee of Seventy

11:30-12:30 Lunch

12:30-1:45 Panel on Challenges to Mainstream Media

Josh Cornfield, Editor, Metro (Philadelphia)
Dave Davies, Senior Writer, Philadelphia Daily News
Phyllis Kaniss, Executive Director, American Academy of Political and Social Science, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania
Susan Phillips, Reporter, WHYY, Inc.
Chris Satullo, Former Editorial Page Editor and writer of the Center Square Column, The Philadelphia Inquirer
Wendy Warren, Vice President and Editor, Philly.com

2:00-4:00 Roundtable on Alternative Media

Matt Golas, Managing Editor, Plan Philly
Gustavo Martinez, Reporter, Al Día
Beth McConnell, Executive Director, Media and Democracy Coalition
Bruce Schimmel, Founder & Editor Emeritus, Philadelphia City Paper
Dan Urevick-Ackelsberg, Founder, Young Philly Politics
Linn Washington, Co-Director, Multimedia Urban Reporting Lab (MURL)
Todd Wolfson, Founder, Media Mobilizing Project

I should be in the audience.....

But not on a panel.

I really think part of the role of alternative media is to experiment with various ideas and platforms. The mainstream media (which I guess I am a part of now) then copies the good stuff and tries to make money with it. It's a weird dynamic and I sort of wonder how long it will last.

---
Check out "It's Our Money"

Congratulations

And in the spirit of that, I'd seriously recommend patting yourself on the back for your allotted time. What I mean is, from my experience with these sorts of colloquia, people get the most charge out of actually seeing how things were done. This could be as small as showing how YPP was arguably instrumental in the whole ongoing voter's return case, or some similar tour of instances of YPP discussion that led to some positive, progressive "good." The platitudes of an empowered media are easy and the principles I'm guessing could be reiterated by anyone on that panel. I think people want to see something more along the lines of a concrete delineation of how something works, rather than anything like an article of faith or theory, or what have you.

In short, treat it like a show and tell, and have fun with it. From experience, you'll likely have a better engaged audience, even if the first question you get during Q&A is "what's a blog?"

Ben, I don't really buy the mainstream successes are indy sell-outs thesis you're selling, so to speak. I don't think "indy media" as traditionally defined has any special claim or experimental investment over new media than the mainstream does. "New media" is rather something that both have been faced with and have developed rather different strategies to capitalize upon it. I'd actually argue in the long run mainstream, politically lazy media has it worked out better than what has evolved out of traditional "alt or indy" media outlets. I think a certain audience insularity has developed among the more and more digitally dependent "alt voice", that might multiply the number of sophisticated and savvy voices out there ... as it grows out of touch with a broad reader base. When it comes down to it, (politically-oriented, as opposed to underground-look-at-me-kick-myself-in-the-jimmy-oriented online) alt media consistently loses out to the mainstream media in a search-engine driven marketplace. In short, I think some of its power beyond insular networking may be lost as alt-media/journalism becomes more reliant on tiny boxes typed into as opposed to boxes littered through a city.

But then again, I chose not to visit this board again until I was good and drunk, so maybe what I'm trying to articulate is utterly incoherent.

Thanks for the ideas,

Thanks for the ideas, Steakums.

Some other thoughts

As "cheesesteak" points out, it's important to highlight the stories that alternative media covers that wouldn't otherwise get covered by the mainstream press - I know that Media Mobilizing Project was the first to document Asian Americans United's story about the abusive deportation of a pregnant Philadelphia woman that ended in a miscarriage. The Notebook has routinely focused on privatization and the role of private contracts in the school district as well as unpacked the complexities of inequity among Philadephia's poorest and, often most racially isolated schools. YPP, like all the great folks above, has had plenty of stories "break" here as well.

YPP also succcessfully challenges the mainstream media's tendency to define dialogue as pro-con, whereas I think you and Ray and others have maintained YPP as an unabashed left group that also has knock-down drag-out debates on this side o'the fence. In other words, you show how there is value in working out the nuances to an issue, not just marking polar opposites.

And finally, I guess what I appreciate about YPP is that so often, I and plenty of others get characterized as "protesters" by the mainstream media (more conscious of that now than ever), without giving folks like us a chance to present what the issues we're protesting are all about. So it's vital that there's a space and role for people whose viewpoints are marginalized to have a space for creating, dialoguing and engaging one another and not just automatically starting from the point of being the anti to whatever the mainstream viewpoint that exists out there.

Thanks Dan!

Thanks! I hope you and Tim

Thanks!

I hope you and Tim don't mind, but, I am going to use both of your answers (as well as Steakum's suggestion about what I focus on while on stage).

Um, professional payday

Um, professional payday lender blogger, I think you are in the wrong place.

I edited your post a little, too.

wow, my friend Dan UA is a

wow, my friend Dan UA is a panelist. They were really in dire needs to fill that chair I guess. ;)

a fistful of thoughts on that whole blog + democracy thing

1) Blogs (read: YPP) as a place for citizens to interact with elected officials and folks running for office in an environment that can be alternately critical, hostile, enthusiastic, activist. Sometimes all four at different times with the same politicians;

2) Blogs (again YPP) as a think tank for the rest of the political ecosystem, from legislation to journalism. There are a lot of ideas banging around, and they filter through all the way up to folks saying them on TV;

3) Blogs/YPP as editorialization-by-ridicule, in a very Gen-Y, The Daily Show style, that can be astonishingly direct and effective;

4) Blogs/YPP as a place for honest-to-goodness amateur investigative journalism. That, after all, is what a lot of the fight over access to resources like election results is all about; individual YPPers can comb the data and find the honey. (I still feel proud of some of my public-record combing in the mayoral primary; others have different stories.)

That is helpful, Tim.

That is helpful, Tim. Thanks!

So, uh, how'd it go?

So, uh, how'd it go?

The replay?

Supposedly here is a video of the event. However, after a few minutes effort I can't get it to run. I do know some UPenn buildings are down for power grid and/or server maintenance today (Sunday) so maybe that's why I'm getting nothing. The other possibility is that Firefox isn't compatible with however they're streaming, so I have to go find where I put Explorer on my laptop. Accessibility, Annenberg, ahem.

That said, I'd be keen on what Dan or attendees thought of the event.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content